Compare Mission Australia vs Philadelphia Corporation for Aging BETASee how working at Mission Australia vs. Philadelphia Corporation for Aging compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at Mission Australia vs. Philadelphia Corporation for Aging. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.
- Mission Australia scored higher in 9 areas: Overall Rating, Career Opportunities, Compensation & Benefits, Work-life balance, Senior Management, Culture & Values, CEO Approval, % Recommend to a friend and Positive Business Outlook.
What Employees Say
- "Telecommuting" was the most mentioned Pro at Philadelphia Corporation for Aging.
- "Upper management" was the most mentioned Con at Philadelphia Corporation for Aging.
I have been working at Mission Australia for more than a year
Well structured and resourced NGO with solid company ethics charter
Like any large NGO, bureaucracy can get in the way of day to day work flow
I worked at Philadelphia Corporation for Aging full-time for more than a year
Helping people in a vulnerable population
Horrible work culture. Billable hour system
Advice to Management