Compare Procter & Gamble vs L'Oréal BETA

See how working at Procter & Gamble vs. L'Oréal compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at Procter & Gamble vs. L'Oréal. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.
Procter & Gamble company icon

Procter & Gamble

L'Oréal company icon

L'Oréal

Employee Ratings

  • Procter & Gamble scored higher in 9 areas: Overall Rating, Career Opportunities, Compensation & Benefits, Work-life balance, Senior Management, Culture & Values, CEO Approval, % Recommend to a friend and Positive Business Outlook.
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
4.2
(based on 7415 reviews)
Procter & Gamble employees rated their Overall Rating 0.4 higher than L'Oréal employees rated theirs.
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
3.8
(based on 4058 reviews)
Career Opportunities
Career Opportunities
3.9
Career Opportunities
3.7
Compensation & Benefits
Compensation & Benefits
4.2
Procter & Gamble employees rated their Compensation & Benefits 0.4 higher than L'Oréal employees rated theirs.
Compensation & Benefits
3.8
Work-life balance
Work-life balance
3.4
Procter & Gamble employees rated their Work-life balance 0.3 higher than L'Oréal employees rated theirs.
Work-life balance
3.1
Senior Management
Senior Management
3.6
Procter & Gamble employees rated their Senior Management 0.4 higher than L'Oréal employees rated theirs.
Senior Management
3.2
Culture & Values
Culture & Values
4.2
Procter & Gamble employees rated their Culture & Values 0.5 higher than L'Oréal employees rated theirs.
Culture & Values
3.7
CEO Approval
CEO Approval
Procter & Gamble Ceo David S. Taylor
94%
94%David S. Taylor
Procter & Gamble employees rated their CEO Approval 5% higher than L'Oréal employees rated theirs.
CEO Approval
L'Oréal Ceo Jean-Paul Agon
89%
89%Jean-Paul Agon
% Recommend to a friend
% Recommend to a friend
87%
Procter & Gamble employees rated their % Recommend to a friend 13% higher than L'Oréal employees rated theirs.
% Recommend to a friend
74%
Positive Business Outlook
Positive Business Outlook
72%
Procter & Gamble employees rated their Positive Business Outlook 13% higher than L'Oréal employees rated theirs.
Positive Business Outlook
59%

Salaries

L'Oréal has 25 more total submitted salaries than Procter & Gamble.
Salaries for similar jobs
Salaries for similar jobs
Human Resources Specialist1 Salaries
A$84,756/yr
Account Manager4 Salaries
A$76,758/yr
Business Analyst1 Salaries
A$63,224/yr
Salaries for similar jobs
Human Resources Manager4 Salaries
A$144,211/yr
Sales Assistant1 Salaries
A$25/hr
Manager3 Salaries
A$120,000/yr

What Employees Say

  • Procter & Gamble had 180 more reviews than L'Oréal that mentioned "Work environment" as a Pro.
  • "Slow decision making" was the most mentioned Con at Procter & Gamble.
  • "Long working hours" was the most mentioned Con at L'Oréal.
Pros
Pros
"Great people"(in 317 reviews)
"Work environment"(in 311 reviews)
Pros
"Work environment"(in 131 reviews)
"Fast paced"(in 129 reviews)
Cons
Cons
"Slow decision making"(in 374 reviews)
"Slow decision"(in 145 reviews)
Cons
"Long working hours"(in 274 reviews)
"Working hours"(in 113 reviews)
Featured Review
"Great team"10 Sep 2020

Former Employee - Sales BDM

I worked at Procter & Gamble full-time

Pros

Great products, resources, managers, training

Cons

There were no cons to mention

Current Employee - Business Manager

I have been working at L'Oréal full-time for more than 8 years

Pros

Fun, fast and full of passionate people who are willing to help each other out. As an individual you can effect change and make a real impact on the Business.

Cons

Culture is unique vs most Australian businesses. It's not for everyone - and even if it is, can take some time (~1 year) to get used to.

Job Postings

L'Oréal has 409 more recently posted open jobs than Procter & Gamble.