Compare Resources For Human Development vs Philadelphia Corporation for Aging BETA

See how working at Resources For Human Development vs. Philadelphia Corporation for Aging compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at Resources For Human Development vs. Philadelphia Corporation for Aging. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.
Resources For Human Development company icon

Resources For Human Development

Employee Ratings

  • Resources For Human Development scored higher in 3 areas: Career Opportunities, CEO Approval and % Recommend to a friend.
  • Philadelphia Corporation for Aging scored higher in 4 areas: Overall Rating, Compensation & Benefits, Senior Management and Positive Business Outlook.
  • Both tied in 2 areas: Work-life balance and Culture & Values.
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
2.6
(based on 215 reviews)
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
2.8
(based on 54 reviews)
Career Opportunities
Career Opportunities
2.4
Resources For Human Development employees rated their Career Opportunities 0.4 higher than Philadelphia Corporation for Aging employees rated theirs.
Career Opportunities
2.0
Compensation & Benefits
Compensation & Benefits
2.3
Compensation & Benefits
2.6
Philadelphia Corporation for Aging employees rated their Compensation & Benefits 0.3 higher than Resources For Human Development employees rated theirs.
Work-life balance
Work-life balance
3.0
Work-life balance
3.0
Senior Management
Senior Management
2.0
Senior Management
2.1
Culture & Values
Culture & Values
2.7
Culture & Values
2.7
CEO Approval
CEO Approval
Resources For Human Development Ceo Marco Giordano
34%
34%Marco Giordano
Resources For Human Development employees rated their CEO Approval 6% higher than Philadelphia Corporation for Aging employees rated theirs.
CEO Approval
Philadelphia Corporation for Aging Ceo Holly Lange
28%
28%Holly Lange
% Recommend to a friend
% Recommend to a friend
38%
Resources For Human Development employees rated their % Recommend to a friend 3% higher than Philadelphia Corporation for Aging employees rated theirs.
% Recommend to a friend
35%
Positive Business Outlook
Positive Business Outlook
17%
Positive Business Outlook
28%
Philadelphia Corporation for Aging employees rated their Positive Business Outlook 11% higher than Resources For Human Development employees rated theirs.

Salaries

Salaries for similar jobs
There are no salaries matching this company.
There are no salaries matching this company.

What Employees Say

  • "Rhd" was the most mentioned Pro at Resources For Human Development.
  • "Telecommuting" was the most mentioned Pro at Philadelphia Corporation for Aging.
  • Resources For Human Development had 11 more reviews than Philadelphia Corporation for Aging that mentioned "Upper management" as a Con.
Pros
Pros
"Rhd"(in 12 reviews)
"Open environment"(in 11 reviews)
Pros
"Telecommuting"(in 6 reviews)
"Paid holidays"(in 5 reviews)
Cons
Cons
"Rhd"(in 17 reviews)
"Upper management"(in 16 reviews)
Cons
"Upper management"(in 5 reviews)
"Social work"(in 3 reviews)
Featured Review

Current Employee - DSP

I have been working at Resources For Human Development full-time for more than a year

Pros

I like the hours, co/workers and the clients. They are currently closed because of Covid-19 but I would go back.

Cons

The pay is not the best, the management could be better.

Advice to Management

Just care about your employees

"Avoid"17 Apr 2020

Former Employee - Service Coordinator

I worked at Philadelphia Corporation for Aging full-time for more than a year

Pros

Helping people in a vulnerable population

Cons

Horrible work culture. Billable hour system

Advice to Management

Improve culture

Job Postings

Resources For Human Development has 154 more recently posted open jobs than Philadelphia Corporation for Aging.