Recruiter call > hiring manager call > 2 calls, each with 2 people from cross functional teams > presentation > general manager. I got to the presentation stage. The prompt was very broad - in short "present a product you owned from start to finish, including how you scoped requirements, stakeholder management, timeline management, and executing requirements". It was meant to be ~20 minutes with questions. I was rejected and the feedback the recruiter shared was that the team wanted to hear more about how I worked with other teams, particularly engineering, and the details about how the product was built. I didn't approach it exactly that way, instead presenting what the product was, the problem, solution, how we identified the solution, ways to tackle building the solution, the timeline, stakeholders and working with them throughout, etc. I didn't dive deep into work with a particular team because, well, the prompt didn't really seem to call for it. All in all, while I enjoyed meeting the people I did, I feel pretty negatively coming out of it. From my perspective, presentations with broad prompts should be judged by: was it relatively engaging, was it organized, did I understand it, did they give me a sense of how they did things, could they answer questions about it... not “did it include this specific thing that we didn’t specifically ask for.”