Skip to contentSkip to footer
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Clariant

      Is this your company?

      Clariant reviews

      Upper Site Management Needs a Reboot - Process Engineer Clariant Employee Review

      3.0
      22 June 2022
      Process engineer
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      Pay is good, some flexibility, remote work allowed somewhat

      Cons

      Site management needs a reboot. Seems to not have direction. Too few employees lead to lost productivity. Pay is good but workers are treated poorly. Operators and technicians run the plants and due to poor treatment, Clariant loses too many. Line management is good but overruled frequently by site management. Too many times subject matter experts are ignored by site management also.

      Explore other reviews about Clariant

      5.0
      10 Apr 2025
      Manager
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      Positive add you’re, great work guys

      Cons

      No free lunch poor bathrooms

      4.0
      28 Feb 2026
      Engineering coop
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      Great exposure to real plant operations and how engineering work impacts reliability, quality, and downtime. Hands-on troubleshooting opportunities—good place to build structured problem-solving skills. Strong process documentation environment (P&IDs/SOPs/LOTO), which helps you learn disciplined engineering practices. Projects feel practical and meaningful, not just “intern work.”

      Cons

      Learning curve: There’s a lot to learn early on (systems, standards, plant terminology), so the first few weeks can feel information-heavy.

      See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All
      Related searches: Clariant jobs | Clariant salaries | Clariant benefits | Clariant interviews
      Clariant reviewsClariant Process Engineer reviewsClariant review