Good - Logistics Analyst Creaform Employee Review

3.0
6 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good place to work but pay is not good

Cons

Is a nice company but management is somehow horrible

avatar
Creaform Response
1mo
Thank you for sharing your feedback and for taking the time to recommend FARO Creaform. We’re pleased to hear that you considered it a good place to work. We also take your comments regarding compensation and management seriously. Compensation competitiveness and management practices are areas we continuously review and improve, and feedback like yours helps inform those efforts. We appreciate your transparency and wish you continued success in your career.

Explore other reviews about Creaform

5.0
22 Aug 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Collaborative environment, in-depth training, no micromanagment, remote work.

Cons

Only con is that the HQ is in Quebec.

avatar
Creaform Response
3y
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback with us. We are thrilled to hear that you have had positive experiences working in our collaborative and supportive environment, as well as benefiting from our in-depth training and remote work opportunities. We appreciate your comment about our headquarters being located in Quebec. While we understand that this may be a disadvantage for some employees, we strive to create a strong company culture and provide equal opportunities for all of our team members, regardless of location. Thank you again for your feedback. We value your contributions to our team and are committed to creating a positive and supportive work environment for all of our employees.
1.0
27 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Direct leadership is good. Immediate team works hard despite constant complaints from legacy Creaform employees showing lack of trust.

Cons

Following the merger, leadership appears to remain largely aligned with the legacy Creaform organization. There is a strong preference for maintaining established ways of working, with limited openness to change or meaningful integration with the new teams. Resistance to adaptation is often vocal and, in practice, tends to shape outcomes. At the same time, leadership behavior reflects a cost-first, context-last mindset-- prioritizing near-term financial or structural targets without first investing in a clear understanding of the work, capabilities, or downstream impact. Decision-making seems heavily influenced by a small group of long-trusted advisors, and the CEO appears to rely on their perspective. As a result, the organization lacks a coherent long-term strategy and instead operates in a largely reactive mode, responding to the concerns of familiar voices rather than driving a disciplined, forward-looking vision.

1
avatar
Creaform Response
1mo
Thank you for taking the time to share such a detailed and thoughtful perspective. We appreciate your recognition of the strength of direct leadership and the commitment of our teams in a period of significant transformation. We also acknowledge that mergers of this scale inevitably introduce complexity, cultural friction, and differing expectations around ways of working. Following the merger, our organization has been deliberately working to balance continuity with evolution. While preserving what made both FARO and Creaform successful, we also recognize the need for strong integration across legacy teams, and broad representation of perspectives in decision‑making. This evolution is ongoing. We hear your feedback regarding the importance of deeply understanding team capabilities and operational realities before setting structural or cost‑related targets. Sustainable integration requires thoughtful investment, dialogue, and alignment—not just efficiency. Feedback like yours helps us reflect and improve as we continue to build a more unified, forward‑looking organization. Thank you for sharing your experience.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All