IBM GBS Consulting - Consulting IBM Employee Review

1.0
20 May 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I cannot think of any Pros of IBM at the current time. IBM USED to be a company that had core values, integrity and followed these religiously, the company is now run by mostly greedy execs and deceptive motives.

Cons

1. For IBM GBS Consulting, if you are not VERY keen on programming and testing, you are wasting your time. IBM GBS looks for desperate, highly skilled technical brains to do the hard work and in return they are given a low pay, no choice in projects and pigeon-holed based on their degree / skillset. 2. IBM GBS operates under a guise of flexibility and variety when this is not the case. Its main aim is to fill seats on large contracts to private enterprises such as large banks (and a few smaller government departments) and its number one main is to make sure these young "consultants" are billable in some way shape or form. This means a lot of grunt work that is menial and highly technical in nature to tight deadlines with very little "fun" and work that is very stressful in nature. 3. Ultimately, you should not apply unless you absolutely love getting your hands dirty and interacting very little with actual people. You will be a backdoor programmer/tester a large amount of the time. Heads down, butt up and program/test small modules of code with no strategic vision or career growth is the mantra that IBM GBS push. 4. Their "Grad Blue" program is a glorified university course with far too much information to decipher in a small amount of time. Its basically a trial to see how desperate you are and whether you are cut out for the rat race that is GBS consulting. Good luck ambitious grads :) But just know, you can earn more, perform much more stimulating work and enjoy your a much, much better life work/balance at other IT companies that treat you like a human instead of a machine.

Explore other reviews about IBM

5.0
17 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Salary and benefits are good Coworkers are really smart people

Cons

Frequent overtime is apparently something common at ibm

4.0
26 Aug 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Disclaimer: A lot of what I'm writing below of course depends on the work area and management chain. But I found this to be fairly pervasive policies in IBM in my 9+ years with the company. 1. IBM's policies and management are very flexible when it comes to working remotely or accommodating various life situations (sick days, doctor visits, etc.). Management is encouraged to measure an employee by their work and impact, and not by hours spent at their office. 2. Great colleagues! Though unfortunately, many have been leaving due to the instability of IBM's HW development business. 3. At least in my area, there's a high level of flexibility on which projects should I undertake based on my and my management assessment of business impact.

Cons

1. Unfortunately, IBM still uses the "normal distribution" rating system, where at the end of the year each employee is ranked as a top contributor (5%), above average contributor (15%), average contributor (~75%), and bottom contributor (5%). This curve is difficult to apply in the R&D world, where you may have many members of the team working long and hard hours, and end up being "average contributors" at the end of the year, because there just isn't room for all to be top contributors. 2. The above may not be so disturbing, if only IBM didn't practically cancelled all raises, performance bonuses and incentive for the non top-performers. I've had a consistent "above average" rating in the last 4-5 years, and my raise and performance bonus were ridiculous mere 1.5-2% of my salary. Were I rated "average contributor" I would have gotten NOTHING. So you can imagine that people can go year after year without any raise to their salary. From talking to manager friend, this is IBM's way to eliminate the non-top-performers without having to fire them, as part of its direction of reducing US manpower. 3. Hiring freeze in many areas - again, as part of IBM's attempt to reduce its workforce across North America and Europe we see many jobs move to the India and Far East markets. This is of course upsetting to see local teams shrink and disappear, especially when many great local IBM colleagues and experts begin to drop out. From my experience thus far working with India SW teams - they are still very far away from the standards I would have expected from US and Europe based teams. 4. Poor top down communication about company's and divisions' future. Employees learn from rumors and news websites what's about to come...

636
avatar
IBM Response
10y
Thanks for sharing your experience, and we're glad that you've had a positive experience working with talented colleagues and taking advantage of IBM's programs. IBM is in the midst of a major transformation, --our Systems business is going through its own changes to strengthen competitiveness. Change is never easy. As part of our transformation, we just launched a whole new approach for how we are coaching employees, delivering feedback and managing reviews. No distribution guidelines or what some think of as 'stacked rankings." What's particularly great is that this was co-designed with our employee base from all over the world... to the tune of hundreds of thousands of page views, comments, on-line debates and discussions. IBMers even named the new system Checkpoint, to reflect the regular feedback rituals we're adopting. Managers are more empowered with the new methodology to help them acknowledge the great work of their teams and help their employees develop professionally. These steps and more are showing up in our employee surveys as well. So IBMers are feeling the change. We are confident these changes will help us in continuing to attract and retain great talent.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All