The whole process is as follows: Round 1: Recruitment Team -> Round 2: Software Dev -> Round 3: VP of Engineering -> Round 4: Manager -> Round 5: CTO. Rounds 2-5 contained technical challenges (in a language of your choosing) along with general software development questions. Overall I did enjoy meeting a lot of the team and I felt I got on incredibly well with many of them, especially my would-be manager and software devs in round 4, who were incredibly nice and great to talk to. However, I cannot give the process a positive review due to two reasons: - Firstly, as mentioned in a previous review, the CTO was incredibly rude. While I felt I got on well in the previous rounds and mixed well with the team, it was essentially wasted after round 5. - Secondly, the 5-round interview process seems unnecessary and, while the individual rounds are relatively easy and I can appreciate Anomali's high selection criteria, the process as a whole is taxing to say the least. You will be asked on the time complexity of any algorithms that are being discussed, and you are expected to create efficient solutions in the technical challenges e.g. reverse an array of integers - expected to be done in O(n) time. I recommend knowing the time complexities of popular algorithms and, if you are planning to use a particular algorithm in any of the technical challenges, you will probably be asked for it's time complexity. You will likely be asked general Linux, SQL and Git commands.

Took about an hour in total. It was split into 2 sections. The 1st section was just talking and answering technical questions. 2nd part involved doing some live coding questions.