I applied online. The process took 2 weeks. I interviewed at Greenhouse Software in Feb 2025
Interview
Here's a 30-word summary you can use:
I interviewed with Greenhouse Software for a Cloud Kitchen role. The interview included a Restaurant Menu programming question. Although I completed the interview, I did not receive an offer.
I applied through an employee referral. The process took 5 days. I interviewed at Greenhouse Software (New York, NY) in Feb 2025
Interview
Interviewer was receptive and helpful, created a collaborative environment. I only got to the initial technical screen. I was conducted in a coder pad environment with a single question that required multiple steps to fully complete.
Thank you for your feedback! We're glad you found our interviewer helpful and the environment collaborative during your technical screen. We appreciate you sharing your experience and wish you the best in your job search.
Sincerely,
The Greenhouse Talent Acquisition Team
I applied online. The process took 3 weeks. I interviewed at Greenhouse Software in Feb 2025
Interview
During the one-hour screening call, I was informed that the total interview process would take approximately seven hours—nearly a full workday. It began with a one-hour assessment, followed by three additional technical assessments and two one-hour interviews if the initial assessment was passed. While this might be feasible for someone who is currently unemployed, for me, it was an immediate red flag. For a company that aims to improve the hiring process, I was confused why they would make it so difficult for job seekers, until I remembered that their clients are the corporations not the people seeking employment.
That said, I have strong reservations about live coding assessments, particularly when they feel unnecessarily restrictive and counterproductive. In my experience, the interviewer himself acknowledged the difficulty of the challenge, and while the company emphasized that we could use "tools" like ChatGPT, they also imposed strict limitations on how they could be used. If the goal is to evaluate how candidates perform in a real work environment, then the assessment should reflect that—allowing candidates to use tools as they naturally would on the job.
Additionally, I was initially told I could work in silence, yet I was frequently interrupted with questions throughout the assessment, which made for a disjointed experience. Another aspect I find perplexing is that live coding sessions are often conducted with random employees rather than the hiring manager. In most industries, interviews are between the candidate and decision-makers—not with various team members in a high-pressure, performative setting.
The takeaway: If you're comfortable with live coding, you'll likely do well. If not, prepare as best as you can, stay resilient, and don’t let it discourage you.
Greenhouse Software response
1y
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We understand that the interview process is a significant investment of time, and we continuously evaluate our approach to ensure it is both effective and respectful of candidates’ commitments.
Our goal is to create a structured and fair process that allows candidates to showcase their skills in an environment that reflects real-world problem-solving.
We strive to create coding assessments that simulate the work an engineer at Greenhouse would perform, which may include the use of generative AI tools. We welcome transparent use of generative AI in the interview process for certain roles with the expectation that candidates can thoroughly explain the prompts they create and/or discuss in-depth the technical decisions they make. We appreciate your perspective on the use of tools during the session and will take this into consideration as we refine our approach.
We also value the involvement of multiple team members in our hiring process, as collaboration is a key part of our culture. We appreciate your time and feedback, and wish you the best in your job search.