The process begins with a code test, followed by interviews for those who pass. I didn’t make it past the code test phase. I was confident in my solution, which I verified using hypothesis testing, and it appeared to work correctly.
However, I received a generic email stating that I didn’t get enough points to proceed. That was disappointing, especially since there was no feedback on what went wrong. If the issue was related to code style, it feels somewhat arbitrary. Alternatively, it might be a canned response that doesn’t reflect the actual reason.
This was my second time applying, six months after my first attempt, and both times I received the same vague rejection email. It left me with no real insight into how I could improve or what criteria were being prioritized.