The only good thing was it started on time. I only had one round. The bad thing was professionalism and their approach to the entire interview. They asked textbook questions which are useful only in a college exam but rarely beyond that. As for coding questions, they were standard questions picked from Geek4Geeks that one could Google in 5 seconds (and it's actually easy in virtual interviews, but anyways that's just my ethics and expectations from a reputed company talking). Their expectation was to know the solution beforehand. There were apparently negative marks for finding a solution of the same time complexity if it was not what they knew and they were just looking for the only solution they already knew, to the extent that hints given talked of the number of lines of solution. I understand why someone wants a solution of a particular time complexity, but i felt let down by the interviewers a lot and did not feel that it's a place I want to work with. For more context, I was interviewed by someone who was younger than me, from a lesser reputed college, who passed out with a lesser CGPA. I feel that if the interviewer was more mature, they would value problem solving skills more from an experienced person rather than memorized questions one expects when one interviews straight out of college. It would be good if the company focusses on hiring people for their skills and not for what they studied in college years ago. I am not sure if this is how everyone in the company approaches problem solving and evaluation. Needless to say, professionalism continued after the interview and nobody bothered to even let me know of an accept/reject or give any feedback on what areas I need to improve on.