I applied through a recruiter. The process took 1 week. I interviewed at Lemon.io (Ciudad de Mexico) in Mar 2025
Interview
I applied to them through their platform. I filled out my profile, and afterward, they contacted me to schedule a 60-minute interview.
The discussion mostly focused on my professional background, my skills, and the Lemon company model. At one point, the interviewer even showed me a specific project where she said I could be a good fit. Then, at the end, came a 7-question test... and that’s where things started to get "interesting."
The next day, Lemon (the same interviewer) contacted me via email. She said the client had implemented a developer freeze in the meantime, so they couldn’t hire me for that particular project. "Okay," I said to myself... but then the email continued: based on their internal standards, they also can’t—and don’t want to—hire me at all. That part honestly raised some eyebrows on my side.
I mean, their company model is supposed to be: we have a selection-filtering interview process, developers get selected into our pool, and then clients can choose from that pool. So how is it possible that a project-specific hiring freeze was the main reason the selection process was stopped for me—and only afterward did they mention I don't fit into their developer pool?
Does this mean that if clients urgently want to hire developers and the company finds someone available on the market, they just skip or loosen their own selection criteria to land that person on the project?
Or did the interviewer simply lie in her response email? Because logically, the first step should always be passing their standard selection process—regardless of any specific project. So why was this particular project even mentioned as the reason for not continuing the process?
It feels weird—and honestly, I think this is the kind of behavior that should be a red flag for their potential or future clients. From my experience, it seems like the company doesn’t fully follow its own standards, and this "slip" kind of revealed one of their dirty little tricks.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
7-question multiple-select test related to FE skills (React, Next.js).
The weird part was that all the questions were multi-select, so basically, multiple answers were correct. However, as my interviewer mentioned, there were "more correct" and "less correct" options — but you could only choose one. Here I started feeling a bit confused, but okay, I paid attention to this "twist."
Thank you for your feedback.
We are sorry that the process may have come across as unclear. The tech stack you applied for was open exclusively for a specific client project and is not currently available for general onboarding on our platform. When the client implemented a hiring freeze, we had to stop all related evaluations and couldn’t proceed further with joining the pool.
We appreciate the effort you put into the process and wish you success moving forward.