P3 Logistic Parks interview questions

The interview process was lengthy and required significant preparation. It included a 30-minute HR online meeting, followed by a 1h30 on-site interview. The on-site stage was not well communicated in advance—only the hiring manager was mentioned, but the interview was conducted by 3 team members, which was unexpected. Afterwards, I was asked to complete a 180-minute online assessment within a short deadline of 3 business days, which added considerable pressure. Despite investing over 6 hours in preparation and interviewing, and follow-ups over two weeks, I eventually received a generic response stating that the role was no longer being progressed due to shifting hiring priorities. This experience felt unprofessional and poorly coordinated. There seemed to be a lack of clarity and alignment internally, particularly regarding the role’s status and hiring needs. This reflects a lack of organization and respect for candidates’ time. It’s concerning that such a demanding process was carried out without clear internal alignment or commitment to the role. Additionally, repeated requests for a salary range or budget were not addressed, making it difficult to assess alignment from the candidate side. Overall, the experience felt unprofessional, unclear, and poorly structured, raising serious concerns about their priorities and internal organization.

Interview Process (Description): The process was highly intensive, involving over five hours of commitment. It began with an initial face-to-face interview, followed by an hour-long session with hiring managers. The final stage was a rigorous three-hour technical assessment designed to test deep competency. Despite the significant time and "intellectual labor" invested, the final communication was a generic, system-generated automated rejection. Pros. The hiring managers were professional during the face-to-face sessions. The technical assessment was relevant and challenging, accurately reflecting the high-level skills needed for the role. Cons: Lack of Professional Reciprocity: After 5+ hours of work, receiving a generic automated response is unacceptable. There is a lack of transparency regarding assessment results. Tone-Deaf Communication: The company sent an automated "candidate experience" survey before providing any personalized feedback on the work I submitted. No Feedback for Growth: Requests for specific performance metrics were ignored, making the hours invested a total loss for professional development. Advice to Management: Reciprocal respect is essential. If you require candidates to perform hours of technical labor, you have a professional obligation to provide more than a system-generated response. Ensure your automated survey tools are timed to follow personalized feedback, not precede it.