Pros: Relevant technical assessment that felt more like a collaborative discussion than a high-pressure, time-boxed problem-solving exercise. Interviewers were focused on understanding my thought process and approach to problem-solving rather than solely evaluating correctness. All interviewers were kind, professional, and respectful during each round, and they took time to provide feedback after the final round. Cons: Expectations for the role were not fully or clearly communicated. While post-interview communication was clear in the earlier stages, the feedback after the final round was brief and lacked specifics. The rejection email took longer than expected and was only sent after I followed up. Overall: I was not selected for the role, but the process itself was fair and gave me insight into the team’s expectations.