The interview process was disappointing and unprofessional. The discussion was superficial, with little meaningful conversation about the role, responsibilities, expectations, or compensation. Salary expectations were not addressed until after an in-person interview had already been scheduled.
Candidates were expected to travel significant distances at their own expense for a short interview despite the lack of prior alignment on key topics. This resulted in unnecessary costs and wasted time.
Overall, the recruitment process gave a poor impression of the company’s culture and respect for candidates. I would not recommend applying unless compensation and expectations are clarified upfront.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
The interview questions were generic and did not provide meaningful insight into the role. There was little discussion about the actual responsibilities, reporting structure, legal scope, key challenges, or compensation package. The position itself appeared poorly defined, with the title changing during the recruitment process, creating uncertainty about the level, responsibilities, and compensation associated with the role. Despite this lack of clarity, candidates were expected to travel significant distances at their own expense for an in-person interview. Overall, the process felt disorganized and not aligned with the standards expected for a senior legal position.