The interview process was technically thorough and clearly designed to assess both hands-on ability and systems thinking. The first part focused on C# optimisation and architectural reasoning, followed by a deeper system design discussion. It was clear they value strong technical depth for this role.
Two of the interviewers were engaging and open, and I appreciated the opportunity to discuss architecture and delivery practices in detail.
However, one interviewer, the Principal Engineer, came across as very intimidating. The majority of the questioning was delivered in a rapid-fire style, with limited conversational flow or feedback. While I understand the need for rigour at this level, the tone felt more interrogative than collaborative, which made it harder to showcase strengths in a natural way. Also, a smile would go a long way in reassuring an interviewee under pressure.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
How would you migrate a .NET monolith to a microservices architecture?
Lento, sin mucha precisión en las preguntas y sin embargo en las respuestas de los participantes no hubo respuestas de las preguntas que nos dieron y no hay ninguna explicación
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Cuál software utilizaba para diseños de preimpresion
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 4 weeks. I interviewed at Rotageek (London, England) in Jan 2019
Interview
It was a 3 part interview: First, was a face to face interview, then a task-based panel interview with a presentation, and then a one to one chat with sales leader. I did have a screening interview with the recruiter who came across my CV before this process.