I applied on Indeed and received a call within minutes of applying. The recruiter had trouble articulating and pronunciating, but asked me if it was ok to record the call, which he said was to "streamline the hiring process", but what it actually meant for was the recruiter to record the call so he could feed the audio transcript to an AI to revamp my resume, which was literally the worse resume possible. Disregarding how unethical that is, I told the recruiter there were way too many errors on it, and it was way too long. He said he fixed it and literally sent the original resume back to me, so I decided just to chalk it up and said it's fine, and of course I got rejected by the client, if you looked at the resume you'd be questioning if I was even literate. The resume literally stated I knew how to code in FORTRAN, a language that came in 1958 and that no Data Scientist would ever touch in a million years, was riddled with words and phrases that AI loves to use, and was three pages long, I almost think I would have had a better shot with a blank resume. A complete waste of an hour, is this company even teaching their recruiters what makes a resume good and what makes a resume bad, I would not be surprised if the entire purpose of that was to train whatever model they are using to do this, considering how bad the resume was and how fast I received a call after applying.

Chamada de vídeo com um dos teach leaders perguntando sobre experiências prévias e conhecimento nas ferramentas a serem usadas durante o trabalho no novo cliente. Sem teste prático algum. Repassagem do currículo para confirmar credenciais e formação.