I applied through a recruiter. The process took 1 week. I interviewed at Valant (Madrid) in June 2018
Interview
The interviewer was not looking for a good software architect. He was just looking for people that blindly aggree with him; even for the things that are clearly wrong but he was unable to recognize it.
For 3 times I was asked for things which initial premises was completly wrong or without sense. Every time I answered: "At first, I would not do things like that."; instead of ask me about explain my self and extend my answer; he just put me a red cross and decided I am not good enough.
Interview questions [3]
Question 1
Do you have a Saga that coordinate, through its state, 2 different bounded contexts that communicates with events. What do you do when the application of an event fail?
( Speaking about a coding test that was just a simple algorithm using a dictionary to avoid O(n2) but, to show that I was able to write good code, I use clases and functions to segregate responsibilities and favour composition over inheritance )
This class does not look good as aggregate...