One screener One "high level chat" Three interviews with EMs One interview with PM One system design In total SEVEN interviews. It seems the interview process is a vestigial holdover from once being part of google. Which isn't a good thing. Especially for a leadership role where purely quantitative data (which it seemed to be the only thing the interviewers were looking for) is a poor indicator of a good leader. I feel as if I would have done better in these interviews if I had read off a list of words being looked for than actually having a conversation about leadership. After HOURS of interviews, I only received a boilerplate rejection email and when asked for feedback, was ignored.