A2F Consulting Reviews

2.2

31% would recommend to a friend

(32 total reviews)

Modibo K. Camara

34% approve of CEO

33% positive business outlook

A2F Consulting has an employee rating of 2.2 out of 5 stars, based on 32 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The A2F Consulting employee rating is 41% below average for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

32 reviews
1.0
12 July 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are no pros of working here.

Cons

A2F cannot hang onto employees, because they have no desire to. They hire people under the pretense that they are a start up just getting off the ground and there is lots of room to grow with the company. In actuality, they hire people and fire them or intimidate them into quitting on a regular basis. No one I worked with while I was there is still employed by them. The owners are unethical and unprofessional and failed to pay myself and other employees wages, failed to reimburse for travel expenses, and deducted money from employee paychecks for health savings accounts but pocketed the money rather than putting it in the account. In addition the actual work that they do is of extremely poor quality, they have no business development skills, and they have no actual desire to help the developing countries they claim to consult on behalf of. Do not work here. If you have worked here and have not gotten paid, I suggest filing a claim with the Maryland Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division.

1.0
16 Mar 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- You might get to travel and work with interesting clients (local authorities, companies etc). - You might get to work with 1-2 competent people who are in the same situation as you are

Cons

A2F is a very small company (~5 people), operated like a one-man show by its CEO. Job applicants are typically promised a startup environment, claims of sealed projects with big name clients and assurance of travel all over the world. In reality, they have been around since 2007 (startup?) and they are surviving on 2-3 small projects a year. While they do occasionally work with big names, most of the projects they claim are about to start, are not in fact awarded to them yet. Often they are either still applying (at the Expression of Interest stage) or are short-listed at best. 90% of your job will consist of writing Expressions of Interest (EOIs) and, if short-listed, Requests for Proposals (RFPs). This is not bad in itself except that most likely you were not hired or were not expecting to have this as your main responsibility. You will be given previous EOIs or RFPs and will be told to recycle them to the new project even if you are a specialist in that area and you realize many things in those documents are either very shallow, dated or inaccurate. Even if you are assigned to work on a project, that will be a secondary priority. It is common that work-in-progress documents are thrown around different people because the text 'does not flow' or because the CEO randomly decides they need to apply for a different project regardless of approaching (or past due) deadlines. Consequently, A2F are always late with their deliverable, which in turn leads to delays in payment. Cons: - Lack of a sustainable business development strategy: the company should hire a specialist in this area. The CEO and COO lack these abilities completely. - Extremely poor management and planning: everything is done at the last minute, with little to no planning. The deliverables are always late by months, affecting company's liquidity (see the other reviews about delayed payments). Assignments are thrown around to people having nothing to do with them. - CEO's personality and management style: although he is a friendly guy, he is highly unorganized and is an extreme micromanager, getting involved in EVERYTHING from writing EOIs to filling your reimbursements for travel. He rewrites and changes ALL documents at the very last minute. He also often does not have the right qualifications or up-to-date knowledge and takes corrections and criticisms very personally. - Unethical practices towards employees and very low employee retention rate: employees are not told the entire story when hired (see above). When problems with payments arise, employees are sweet-talked into waiting (sometimes for months) for payments. Travel reimbursements are done very late and exchange rate fluctuations are passed to employees on the entire amount, including money spent in the US. - People who left the company had to wait months for residual payments and to complain to Maryland department of labor. Once they delay your first paycheck, just quit! Once you allow for larger amounts, they will delay them as long as they legally can.

1.0
31 May 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The only good thing about A2F were the employees I worked with directly, daily. Some of the most wonderful, talented and supportive individuals who made the place tolerable. Somehow, A2F found the right set of good-hearted individuals but failed to value them.

Cons

Bear with me… - A2F is almost 20 years into its operations but still masquerades around like a startup with the leadership blaming everyone but themselves for their many failures. They'll say if they have been in business for so long then they must be doing something “right” - the husband-and-wife Founders are delusional enough to overestimate their role and contribution in the continuation of the organization. The fact that the A2F still exists is because of the many employees who have worked hard and smart to produce good work despite and not because of the Founders. And they have been rewarded by being thrown or pushed out of A2F. -If despite poor management decisions, choosing to work on loss-making projects and having to pay tax penalties among other more questionable things, the Founders continue to blame the financial distress of the company on “external” factors, one would begin to wonder how long A2F will actually last. It is the Founders’ pure luck that they have not been reported to and caught by the right authorities to shut them down yet. - Or perhaps there is a reason why they mostly hire fresh-out-of-school immigrants who are new to the country, with limited support system, little accumulated wealth, and scarce knowledge of legal recourse in the US or Germany. They know they can mistreat these employees with the minimum risk of facing legal consequences. - If you are an immigrant, kindly do not place your future in their immoral hands. The founders are not entirely incompetent but highly morally corrupt enough to go back on their promises and play with your futures. - Lack of trust in senior management is rife. Every person placed at a senior position is always tip toeing around the CEO. Everyone is afraid of disappointing the CEO because they might get fired next day. No matter how good you are as an employee, if it is your turn to be the target of the CEO founder’s displeasure, then it’s a goodbye! This results in managers and HR not being able to do their job of protecting the employees’ interests and investing in their career growth because that is in direct conflict to what the CEO wants. So, plaster a smile on your face every day when you greet him and do not question him ever. - If the Founders keep insisting that "we are like a family" - it means that they will not appreciate boundaries, they will expect the employees to work tirelessly without giving them rewards or appreciation, and the employees will be made to feel indebted to the CEO for even paying their sub-par salaries. The employees are overworked, underpaid, underappreciated working without any rewards, bonuses, or decent annual raises in income. And we are still expected to not complain. (I guess this exhaustive review is the result of bottling it all in for some time now) - On the topic of sub-par salaries, the company starting in 2023 has not been paying its employees their monthly salaries on time with delays amounting up to 2 to 3 months or more. And this not the first time this has happened. These delays and other decisions made by the management has had damaging ripple effects to all the employees on a personal and professional level. How a company handles a tough time reveals a lot about the character of the firm and its decision makers (in this case the infamous ‘Founders’, because no one else in the senior management is ever allowed to have a say in anything) - choosing to open a physical office in Portugal (at a time where your company is facing financial problems and remote work is more acceptable than ever before) over paying your employees in US or Germany their salaries is not reflective of a company that cares for its employees. - Forget about bad times, even in good times, there has been no investment in the growth of employees. If the boss starts harping about in June 2022 that the company is already in profits but come December you are told that bonuses will not be given out because the company did not make any profits, you know something is wrong. They lack the basic understanding that a ‘company’ is made from its ‘people’, its ‘employees’. Wanting to save A2F by lowering labor costs (hiring in Portugal and firing in US/Germany) is not really saving the ‘company’. They are just saving their failing selves from facing their blunders. -They have NEVER listened to their employees and continue to distrust even those employees who have been with A2F for longer than a year or two. The CEO founder is so afraid of letting go and so involved in everything (micromanaging to the hilt) that he cannot trust his employees to even do their jobs. After working and producing good results for A2F for over a year you still won’t be trusted to work from home because they think you will ‘not work at home’. They refuse to treat you like responsible adults. They say coming to the office creates a good office culture. They first need to learn the definitions of ‘good’ and ‘culture’. Forcing your employees to participate in “potlucks” every month and passing it off as ‘team building activity’ will not cut it. The work model where the team is split between two countries and at most your meetings are with one or two people in your team, you really do not need to be in the office to be productive. This shows that the Founders have zero regard for your time. Zero! - This has become a place, where you compromise on the quality of work to run behind deadlines so that A2F can get the payments from the clients to be able to pay the employees their already delayed salaries. They cannot sustain their finances well enough and long enough to give their employees a breathing space from this kind of a work culture. There is nothing wrong with a “for-profit” company like A2F to want to run behind money, but if that money is not getting translated into good salaries and better work-life balance for the employees, then the least that A2F can do specially by occupying a space in International Development sector is to take up projects that give purpose and meaning to the work of the employees. Unfortunately, there is very little learning and no meaning in the work you will do here. Two things: a) they need to either get a financial advisor, or b) quit the international development space. - Some would say that this is a for profit organization, so poor management, lower salaries, and putting the company first are all common characteristics of these kinds of firms. Well, I would take all of this for a firm, having just whose name on my resume will open more doors for me. I wouldn’t risk my mental health for A2F and the nobodies it is run by.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 32 Reviews

Glassdoor has 36 A2F Consulting reviews submitted anonymously by A2F Consulting employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if A2F Consulting is right for you.