AMP Agency Reviews

3.0

34% would recommend to a friend

(175 total reviews)

Gary Colen

48% approve of CEO

19% positive business outlook

AMP Agency has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 175 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The AMP Agency employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

175 reviews
1.0
26 Nov 2014

Really? These recent reviews are laughable.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You get a paycheck for working your 60+ hours a week.

Cons

The CEO. As numerous other reviews point out, everyone in the company views the CEO as dead weight with zero leadership or talent. Awkward personality, no people skills, and provides no worthwhile contribution to the agency. Likes to play up the CEO angle to try and socialize with female employees. Don't trust anything that the management team tells you. They'll quickly throw you under the bus whenever possible.

avatar
AMP Agency Response
11y
Hey there, The recent positive reviews are a reflection of the work we as a leadership team are getting done. This sometimes means making moves that end up as negative reviews on Glassdoor. The truth is, talent with strong entrepreneurial spirit does really well here as they impact the work and direction of the agency. Entrepreneurial environment means we jump in, hands on, not minding doing the detailed work. I’m not saying it is always right, I’m saying it just is. If you are looking for a slow-pace environment where you’re constantly told what to do, I’ll be honest; we are not the right agency for you. Our hiring mantra is Hungry. Humble. Smart. Hungry to innovate and pave the way of the future, while pushing boundaries with the limited resources one has to work with. Humble, because our culture expels jerks automagically like a body rejects an incompatible transplant. And Smart, because we look for people to grow with. Sure, like any business we have our improvement opportunities, which is why one should also look into the values of ownership and the growth of the company. We’ve always believed in consistently investing in the professional growth and training of our people. We do this in many forms – on-site classes, on-campus classes, internships, webinars, sending folks to conferences, tools, books and subscriptions. Some departments take advantage of this more than others, but judging from the expense reports and time sheets it appears almost every week we have training, education or R&D time. Investing in our people keeps them inspired, engaged and proud to be at our agency. One of the most important steps in evaluating if a company is right for you is physically visit it and meet the people who you’ll be working with on a daily basis. Ask them the hard questions and why they chose to be there - chances are you’ll get a clearer picture.
1.0
21 Feb 2017

Horrible

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If you like drinking alcohol, you'll fit in.

Cons

"Work hard play hard" ethic = we will buy you drinks so that you think that pulling 12 hour days is fun. No management presence at all, teams of all sizes are flat and are expected to self-manage. My boss was generally triple booked for all meetings and never paid any attention to me at all. Someone internal posted a glowing review of the company on Glass Door just days before a big round of layoffs to counteract critiques, but don't buy it. This was the worst place I ever worked -- very long hours with no support. Worst of all, when they (inevitably) failed to make their numbers, they'd just cut a bunch of people and then just let the remaining folks pick up the slack. I literally cried on Sunday nights when I thought about going back to work on Monday morning.

1.0
9 July 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The office is on the promenade and you can walk to the ocean.

Cons

There are other reviews that point out the poor client services and lack of leadership from the CEO and I agree. I don't think there's anyone who would argue against that. The last year this place has really fallen apart. Lots of bad decisions and projects that are led by executives with C and Strategy titles who run around creating unnecessary work to try and justify their role. It's beyond aggravating because they don't provide any value to the clients or the team they're supposed to be helping. It should be a giant warning when the person who claims to be building the strategy doesn't feel that they need to explain what they're doing to anyone on the team who asks. All that leads up to a lot of unnecessary ego from people with overinflated titles and a delusional sense of their value and talent.

avatar
AMP Agency Response
11y
I’d agree with you that around the time of your post we as a management team did not communicate clearly why we were expanding our capabilities and evolving our positioning. Since, late last year, we reengineered our weekly discipline leadership meeting with the goal to align all ranks of management. At BLITZ, like most companies, senior management and department heads tag team to translate and articulate the direction of the agency to broader groups, explain the client and market drivers behind it, and support people towards professional growth and new skill development. Today, any lack of clarity and team feedback is brought back to the leadership team and addressed. Let me also take a stab at addressing the client services and strategy feedback. TL;DR (Too Long; Didn’t Read): To remain relevant, agencies must evolve with the market demand. There has been a lot of fragmentation and complexity in our industry and we’re all racing to figure out how to do it better. This kind of evolution requires experimentation, and often failure, which, at times, results in doing extra work. But we didn’t waste that (and your) extra work. The experimentation helped us figure out how to integrate brand and communications planning with digital strategy, product and service design, user experience, search and social. Today it is a multi-disciplinary practice that maps out the entire brand ecosystem. We’re able to validate hypotheses quickly and guide clients where and how they should invest their marketing dollars. The long version: It is well known that our industry has gone through a lot of change in the last 10 years, resulting in introduction of many new disciplines. There was a myriad of talented specialty shops that did the most amazing work, but chose not to adapt, grow or evolve. Many of those shops are no longer around because their specialty got commoditized, technology and marketing needs evolved, and things like social media and marketing automation became a thing. The disappearance of these shops accelerated as the traditional agencies learned digital, while clients built up their internal teams so they can better manage costs and mitigate risks. The saying “if you don’t change, change will happen to you” couldn’t be truer. This is why in the last 14 years we very purposefully evolved the agency 3 times - from a “Flash shop” to a digital agency, and then again in the last 2 years from a digital agency to an integrated marketing agency with digital product development. The journey from a specialty agency to an integrated agency requires onboarding of new capabilities and skills in a relatively short amount of time. Naturally, this is especially challenging for account and project management. Previously they “only” had to be experts at building websites or managing retainers (no small tasks on their own). Now they have to be experts in servicing clients and teams across a digital / traditional hyper-fragmented environment, involving multiple touch-points, disciplines, and technologies, fused with new business and marketing strategies. It is a tall order, and ramp up for some has been bumpy. But since we’re talking about real people, we chose to give them runway and invest in their growth. Some disagree with the approach, but I stand by it, and I sleep better because of doing the right thing. The outcome? In the last 12 months many of these folks grew professionally, while some moved on. Overall the PM and Account teams are better than they’ve ever been and while we have made significant progress, we continue to work on it very hard, every day. On the topic of strategy. All this change requires innovation in how agencies approach strategy. And to innovate, you have to allow for experimentation and failure, so you can learn. What some perceive as egos I would characterize frustration we’re not evolving fast enough. Experimentation and failure does, at times, results in doing extra work. But we didn’t waste that (and your) extra work. The experimentation led to integrating brand and communications planning with digital strategy, product and service design, user experience, search and social. Today it is a multi-disciplinary practice that maps out the entire brand ecosystem. We’re able to validate hypotheses quickly and guide clients where and how they should invest their marketing dollars. Many BLITiZens agree that the strategy team has done an amazing job evolving and is one of the most unique and respected strategy practices in our industry. But at the end of the day, the real litmus test here is if clients value it, pay for it and hire you again for it. In the past 6 months the team has absolutely killed it - delivering awesome client work and winning great new pieces of business. When you keep getting hired by the client over and over it means it is working, and that they value the agency, the people and the output.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 175 Reviews

Glassdoor has 198 AMP Agency reviews submitted anonymously by AMP Agency employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if AMP Agency is right for you.