3.6
48% would recommend to a friend
Rogers Smith
100% approve of CEO
53% positive business outlook
Pros
- Relaxed workplace with space given for work-life balance - Flexibility for hybrid work schedule and time off - Friendly, congenial environment - Highly competent leadership and mostly supportive supervisors - Located in cool Dupont Circle neighborhood in DC - Small budget allocated to each staff member for professional development
Cons
- Salaries for junior staff are low, seem to be better for mid-level and senior staff - Benefits (healthcare) could be better - Out-of-date and slow internal processes cause frustrations
Pros
The people you meet and befriend (mostly at the junior level) are the more redeemable parts of the job. People are friendly, want their coworkers to succeed, and are always willing to collaborate. All the junior staff are smart and professional. Flexible working hours, days in office/remote.
Cons
Junior staff are grossly underpaid. Many (if not all) junior staff have a master's degree and have been stuck at a program assistant level for 1-3+ years, with no career progression plan, and making less than 60K a year. Across all departments, there is 0 room or pathway for progression. You will only get promoted if someone leaves/retires, so don't bother investing time here in the hopes that you might be able to get promoted. Regardless of what level you are hired at, be prepared to be overworked and undervalued (typical nonprofit structure)- unless you are hired directly to the senior executive team. HR conducts themselves inappropriately when junior employees approach them regarding conflict with senior employees. Obviously, HR is there to take the organization's side but asking your employees if it's their "first adult job" because they voice potential issues with their supervisor, is inappropriate and unacceptable by any professional standards. Lastly, there is no formal compensation review process. You have no guarantee of when you will get a performance-based promotion or raise, regardless of how hard you work. You will get an annual inflation adjustment but that's it.
Pros
- Staff tend to be kind, friendly, and occasionally open to hanging out outside of work. At the office, there is a relaxed and congenial office atmosphere. - Managers tend to also be kind, and usually are conscious of work life balance. Outside of a few rare situations, I have been able to log off at 5pm or earlier every day without worry. - Work projects frequently have direct impact on APSA's members or political science as a discipline, and it does feel like our work has importance. - Brilliant and interesting community. Staff and APSA members are all incredibly smart and work on fascinating subjects and projects. Easy to be intellectually stimulated at work. - Benefits are solid for a higher education focused non-profit. - Really great workplace for folks interesting in pursuing a career in higher education, academia, or DC non-profits and lots of opportunities to network with other folks in those spaces.\ - New executive director started, meaning some of the negatives below may be fixed in near future.
Cons
- Mediocre pay for junior staff, especially for a high-cost of living area like DC. - Seemingly high turnover. Possibly due to mediocre pay, many early career folks view APSA as a stepping stone to another more lucrative career and only stay for a year or two. - Lack of established best practices. There is a lack of institutional knowledge on how programs should be run and what best practices should be for office collaboration. For example, there are no centralized procedures for how to request assistance from finance, from communications, or any other frequent office needs. - Overabundance of small initiatives. APSA is responsible for hundreds if not thousands of small programs, committees, sections, and other projects, leaving work responsibilities spread very thinly.
Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.