employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

Is this your company?

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Reviews

3.8

69% would recommend to a friend

(56 total reviews)
avatar

Greg Ibach

80% approve of CEO

45% positive business outlook

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 56 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Government and public administration industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

56 reviews
2.0
6 June 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The benefits of any federal job are usually what keep people there. The APHIS mission is admirable, and takes a disease risk approach to regulatory decisions. There are many dedicated and intelligent people working for this agency, many of whom are in the field. Training opportunities are available (although this is at the discretion of supervisors, some of whom feel a more well-trained employee is a threat to their position).

Cons

- Management is often short sighted: they treat the symptoms but not the overall problem when dealing with personnel issues. - Nepotism - "Old boys club" mentality with few opportunities for women and working mothers to be promoted without sacrificing family and personal time. There are structural issues that do not allow working parents the flexibility that is often advertised in federal jobs (ie Teleworking, Flexible hours, Flex time, etc). The "perks" are reserved for upper management only, while lower level employees are forced to choose between coming into work or using vacation/sick time to attend to personal matters. Often times, having a more flexible schedule would alleviate much of the stress associated with work/family obligations. - Inability to remove under performing and insubordinate personnel. - "Chain of Command" mentality that forces lower level employees to only be able to report problems to immediate supervisors. Should these supervisors choose not to take action on problems brought to their attention, the employee often has no other recourse, shot of filing a complaint, which can take years to address. - Few opportunities to advance: there are few positions to advance into within states and often times the only way to advance is to 1) wait for someone to retire 2) wait for someone to unfortunately pass away 3) relocate to another state. - Employees who are high producers are often overworked to make up for others who are not as motivated. ^Caveat to above: employees who are "low" performers are not penalized for their work. However, often times, there is resentment from those employees who feel the "high" performers are making them look bad.

2.0
6 July 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are few missions that are more noble than ensuring the health and safety of your nation's food supply and agricultural infrastructure. At APHIS, you face many challenges and opportunities to make a difference by protecting production agriculture. Benefits are good: health care, paid leave and holidays. There are many talented and exceptional employees at APHIS who completely shatter the widely-held notion that government employees are ineffective or substandard.

Cons

•Bureaucratic, slow to make and implement decisions •Risk-adverse management •"Old boys club" •Agency-wide nepotism •Lack of opportunities for career advancement outside the Beltway •Lack of diversity among management •Ivory tower management and headquarters structure that lacks a clear understanding of the on-the- ground challenges of farmers and employees •Decisions which should be grounded purely on science are often governed by politics. •Management consistently ignores the old cliche "If it ain't broken, don't fix it." If something works, you can be sure that someone will waste a lot of time and resources to develop a new improved mousetrap that, once rolled out in two years, won't work at all.

3.0
26 May 2015

Entry-Level Employee

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The agency has a good mission and many wonderful employees dedicated to that mission. Benefits are top of the line. Employees are encouraged to develop. Good hours.

Cons

Starting pay is low. Little flexibility for working parents. Requests for teleworking, flexible schedules are not accommodated. Zero accountability for under-performing or incompetent staff. Nepotism rampant, old management extremely adverse to new ways of thinking. Size of bureaucracy and risk adverse thinking makes modernization of the agency unlikely to happen any time soon. Lack of permanent positions means the best non-managerial staff leave, while the least motivated hang around the longest.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 56 Reviews

Glassdoor has 67 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service reviews submitted anonymously by Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is right for you.