employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Aperture Foundation

Is this your company?

Aperture Foundation Reviews

3.5

50% would recommend to a friend

(17 total reviews)

Chris Boot

59% approve of CEO

26% positive business outlook

Aperture Foundation has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 17 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Aperture Foundation employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media and communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

17 reviews
1.0
27 June 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

long history of important work in photography, shows interesting artists, publishes well-respected books on photography

Cons

management and board constantly fighting and senior staff very unhappy. this means the culture there is very negative. this has been an ongoing issue for the organization. executive director is not well-respected by staff and had not worked in nonprofit industry before. bad management has led to lots of turnover. executive director and board have lots of ideas of how to grow the organization but these ideas are not well-thought out or backed by financial capacity. executive director i please note: Executive Director is not awilliam clifford (as noted below by glass door, this seems to be confusion with another company's CEO).

avatar
Aperture Foundation Response
9y
I am extremely sorry any time I hear that anyone has a bad experience of Aperture. I also appreciate all feedback – here and in person. Any cause to reflect on how we are doing things, and for me personally to reflect on my management approach, is useful, and I hope has a positive outcome. I know I have room to improve. I would like to take the opportunity to address some of your points, as your characterization of Aperture is so different from my experience. Firstly, I feel bound to defend our Board, and the relationship between staff and Board. Our Board is superb – generous and supportive, and extremely well led by our Chair. They are very clear about the difference between their role - governance and their fiduciary responsibility - and the management of the institution, which is left to me and the staff team. The Board don't get involved in any aspects of day to day management and there hasn't been a "fight" of any kind in years. It's a growing Board, and the only departures in recent years have been because one of our Trustees died, and another retired after 20 years of service. Its a strong and stable group of Trustees, and I think I speak for the staff team in saying how much we appreciate them, and I know – because they say so often – that they are proud of us. In all my experience of reporting to a Board – including at the last not-for-profit that I worked for – I have never known a Board as coherent as ours. (Of the 32 years I've worked in photography, across public and private sectors, six were at a not-for-profit education institution, and nine at a photographers' co-operative). I have the highest respect for the senior team here, who are all devoted to achieving the organization's goals, professionally and with a passion for their work. It’s a great place to come to work. Our senior staff are all highly talented, (and easily employable elsewhere should they be unhappy here), and have served an average of 7 years each. It is true that junior staff tend to work here for shorter periods, not least because we recruit many of our junior staff from our intern pool, and we don't expect them to stay on more than two or three years, given they need to move around, improve their position, and find their way in the professional world. Aperture is an ambitious and dynamic organization. We have grown fast, in terms of staff (we have doubled the size of the staff team in the last five years), and the number of projects we take on. I believe everyone here connects with the mission of the organization, and works well with each other. I try, and our senior managers try, to be supportive of everyone employed at Aperture, creatively, professionally and personally. If you – or any past or present member of the staff team – would like to share any advice you have for me, I welcome it, by email (cboot AT aperture DOT com) or by phone: 212 946 7101. - Chris, Executive Director
3.0
6 Jan 2015

Great people, but not for the faint of heart

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

All photography all the time. Everyone who works here is highly engaged with the field internationally and is very committed to the organization. A very active place with lots of events and chances to learn more about photography, interact with artists/photographers/authors/curators, and gain valuable and unique insight into the workings of a publisher, gallery space, and non-profit all at once (not a lot of places have that mix). Many people have been here quite a long time, which could be seen seen as either a pro or con, but it's worth noting that some people find serious job stability. People often take on several roles within their position. This could be seen as a con (see below), but also a pro in that it's possible for a highly motivated person to take initiative and develop their professional skills more than at other organizations. There is also lots of cross-departmental work, no matter what job you have. You know everyone in the office and have worked with them at some point. Everyone is genuinely nice, and it's like a family even when there's professional dissension.

Cons

A large portion of the staff is overworked. This doesn't just relate to workload (which is all NGOs and most professional jobs in NYC), but also people's roles not being well-defined and often encompassing what would be 2-4 positions at another organization. No one does just one job and does it well. This is mostly a result of too many projects happening at one time in relation to staff resources and budgets, as well as projects not being thought out thoroughly and in advance. There isn't much room for career growth, unless you're in the editorial department, where there's a little more flexibility (This is probably because these jobs are the most specialized and therefore, the most valued). Staff morale can be low because people feel overloaded and like it's nearly impossible to do a good job. In a staff full of dedicated people and perfectionists, this is a real downer!

Viewing 1 - 3 of 17 Reviews

Glassdoor has 31 Aperture Foundation reviews submitted anonymously by Aperture Foundation employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Aperture Foundation is right for you.