employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

CIL Strategy Consultants

Engaged employer

CIL Strategy Consultants Reviews

4.1

67% would recommend to a friend

(118 total reviews)
avatar

Jon Whiteman

69% approve of CEO

68% positive business outlook

CIL Strategy Consultants has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 118 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The CIL Strategy Consultants employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

118 reviews
2.0
1 Nov 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Strong Learning Curve: CIL gives new analysts significant responsibility from the start. The learning curve is steep, and within two years, you’ll become a strong, load-bearing contributor with valuable hands-on experience. It’s an intense, fast-track environment that will transform your skillset, especially in client-facing roles. Talented Team: The company has a knack for hiring bright, driven individuals, and you’ll work alongside some of the most talented peers. This creates a great opportunity to form strong professional relationships and even lifelong friendships. Career Launchpad: CIL can be a great first job if you’re looking to build a solid foundation early in your career. After 2-3 years, you’ll have a strong network and be well-positioned to transition to an MBA programme or industry role. Annual Travel Opportunities: Employees enjoy annual travel perks, including a domestic winter trip to destinations like Charleston, Park City, and New Orleans, as well as a summer trip to the annual company party held at an estate outside of London. These trips can be a great way to bond with colleagues and experience new places.

Cons

Workload Creep: While the company promises a 50-hour billable cap with no weekend work, the reality is different. It’s common for hours to climb upwards of 60 per week, often spilling into weekends, especially during high-intensity projects. Internally, CIL has become synonymous with "Consulting Is Life" due to the unrelenting workload. The company doesn’t enforce its own policies on work-life balance. Toxic Leadership and Culture: Leadership, particularly at the partner level, is marked by a lack of emotional intelligence. I once overheard a partner bragging about ignoring feedback on their performance. The organisation is deeply political, and even top performers aren’t safe from favouritism and bias in post-project reviews, which are manipulated to slow down promotions. Inconsistent Feedback: Post-project reviews are not only riddled with favouritism but also suffer from inconsistency. One project manager might grade you as "exceeding expectations," while another may mark the same quality of work as an "area for improvement." There’s no standardisation in how feedback is given, leading to confusion and frustration among employees and an overall experience that can vary greatly by the luck of which manager you get placed with. UK-Controlled US Office: The Chicago office is heavily influenced by UK transplants who dominate decision-making. US-based employees are often sidelined, with their ideas undervalued. The leadership style is rigid and micromanaging, leaving little room for creative input from US contributors. Misrepresented Benefits: CIL misrepresented the 401k match in its offer letters. Many of us were promised a 5% match, only to discover it was reduced to 4.5% after joining. Additionally, employees used to receive a day of Time Off In Lieu (TOIL) for any hours worked over 50, which could be taken at their convenience. Now, TOIL is granted at the project leader's discretion and is certainly not guaranteed; employees can only use it based on their manager’s approval, and TOIL days are often chosen for you rather than allowing for personal flexibility. When these discrepancies were raised with HR, they were indifferent, raising concerns about transparency and trust. Harassment Issues: Sexual harassment is not uncommon, and reports of such incidents are mishandled or ignored, creating a hostile work environment where employees don’t feel supported by HR or leadership. Below-Market Pay and Benefits: CIL markets itself to clients by delivering MBB-quality work at T2 prices, or T2-quality work at T3 prices. To achieve this, they underpay high performers compared to the market, and benefits like the 401k match are subpar. The company attracts talent with promises of a great culture and capped hours, but the reality is long hours for lower pay. 30% Staff Churn: The company’s claims about its supportive culture and sustainable work-life balance are undermined by the fact that the Chicago office has seen 30% of its client-facing staff churn this year, far exceeding the target of 5%. This high turnover reflects the harsh reality of low pay, intense hours, and a deteriorating company culture. Disregard for MBAs: CIL does not value MBAs or prior experience. They believe there’s nothing that can prepare you for CDD and the "CIL way". Recently, the company began actively recruiting MBAs from top US schools like Kellogg and Booth, but they pay so dismally compared to other firms that the effort is largely a waste—and frankly, embarrassing.

3.0
6 July 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Ultimately, CIL is a very good place to start a career, with healthy exit opportunities. There is a culture of constant feedback, it is a great place to develop useful skills for a corporate career, such as slide design, analytics (excel), and critical thinking / storytelling. Employees are generally pretty engaged in the subject matter, and there is a good culture of healthy debate. There is good exposure to private equity/M&A (great exposure for graduates, if that is what you are looking for). People are generally pretty friendly, I would describe people as curious and open. Employees really care about the quality of work. There are a lot of great people working at this firm. There are also good opportunities to involve yourself in any horizontal business functions (albeit time spent on this is on top of your project work). As the firm has grown quickly it had some problems ensuring that ops was up to speed. The firm made some new hires in ops recently so that seems to be in a good place now.

Cons

The working hours are long and unpredictable. You may be told on Monday that your last project, which you have been reading up on for a week, has been cancelled, and you will be joining a 'sprint' project for the next 2 weeks (i.e. cancel all your plans and throw your reading in the bin). This is a consequence of the nature of the work. Salary is a little lower than at other consulting firms, which is seemingly justified by working less / having a good culture. Often, this 'trade-off' doesn't quite materialise, and you will find yourself at the mercy of investor timelines / whatever work the firm has managed to sell. TOIL (Time off in Lieu) is sold as a key mitigating factor, but this is discretionary and rarely materialises, and does not come close to compensating for hours worked (and if it does it never reflects the hours put in - you might work to 1am for 8 nights and get 1 day off, for example). The firm seems to have it's head in the sand about a few things: Employees and management sing laurels about the culture, and how nice everyone is. I would disagree - while there are a lot of lovely people, there is a bit of an 'old boys club' mentality (which I think management is aware of and is trying to change - there are some fantastic D&I efforts at the moment, mostly propelled by junior staff). You will be told that the firm is 'non-hierarchical' - this is not true. Senior staff can throw their weight around in the office (not all choose to, but some do) in ways that would get junior staff into a lot of trouble. There are some very cliquey circles (particularly around mid-senior management), that can make socialising with established employees difficult / uncomfortable for new joiners (I have heard this from several people). The environment is very gossipy; there are a lot of eyes in the office. The senior half of the firm is aware of all feedback/progress of all of the junior half of the firm. There can be a blame culture in review processes. The quality of middle management varies significantly (CIL had a void in this area not too long ago, so perhaps some promotions were rushed). There is little to no say as far as how you might specialise. Ultimately, if a project comes in when you are free, you will be staffed on it. The firm still seems to believe (or chooses to believe) that analysts have a choice - they don't. You will be told to network upwards to specialise - but this rarely translates into self-determinism. Often, you will be staffed on a project as you worked on a similar project previously. Most people who specialise do so out of happenstance. Some analysts find themselves doing several projects in one industry that they do not want to specialise in. There is a very low level of client interaction for juniors. A lot of the work is 'cookie cutter'. This doesn't necessarily mean that it's a bad learning experience, but a lot of the work is long and monotonous. You may spend a month cold calling, or tying up/proofing call transcripts. Currently, management's top priority is to deliver excellent client work. Employee well-being is a priority, but very much secondary.

3.0
20 Apr 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There is concern taken by senior staff to limit working hours, which at times can be extremely brutal. It is unlike other consultancy firms in this regard. Some senior staff take a genuine interest in junior stuff, which helps you into feeling welcome.

Cons

Although pay has been increased slightly, it is still significantly below competitors operating in the same vertical. The lower salary is justified by the "great culture" at CIL, this culture has been somewhat eroded in recent years, this is in part due to a fairly high staff turnover, and a rather aggressive growth strategy. There is almost a constant stream of feedback (if you are on a project for a week or more, meaning it is not uncommon to receive more than 3 pieces of formally written feedback a month). Since significant importance is attached to these pieces of written feedback during your 6-month review, junior staff can be fearful of making any mistake, which are often written up in your feedback. Feedback is often contradictory and I have experienced and witnessed a blame culture, where more senior staff use the written feedback to frequently deflect responsibility downwards for bad output. This makes feedback very unhelpful for personal development. CIL has a good product which is respected by industry, this means that project managers often give the project team little freedom to deviate from established methods and templates. This rinse and repeat attitude means that whilst the sound of Strategy work for a Management Consultancy may sound appealing, the reality of it is that 90% of work is tedious and monotonous.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 118 Reviews

Glassdoor has 152 CIL Strategy Consultants reviews submitted anonymously by CIL Strategy Consultants employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if CIL Strategy Consultants is right for you.