Campus.edu Reviews

3.6

68% would recommend to a friend

(43 total reviews)

Tade Oyerinde

88% approve of CEO

70% positive business outlook

Campus.edu has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 43 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Campus.edu employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

43 reviews
1.0
3 Apr 2025

Run.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The pay used to be decent but they started lowering it to cut costs

Cons

This place is a mess. The most disorganized and mismanaged school I’ve ever worked at. They value numbers over everything else, which leads to a lot of shady practices that made me feel very unethical. Very little training or policies exist, which leads to chaos that isn't managed well. Nepotism and favoritism are rampant. The higher-ups doesn’t understand how a school runs, and most of them don’t come from a background in education at all. If you want a scammy, half-baked school run by tech bros and salespeople, this is the place for you

1.0
11 Apr 2024

For-profit led by serial start up/tech CEOs

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The employees who work, and students who attend, the actual campus (formerly MTI CC out of Sacramento, CA) have an amazing culture and student engagement. Campus.edu out of NYC bought out MTI College a few years ago and they have now merged to be campus.edu. -Students we work with are amazing and inspirational

Cons

-Campus Scholars program is highly focused on numbers vs. student experience and outcomes -Concerning compliance coaching from upper leadership regarding false promises to students and graduation rates although Campus Scholars has not had a graduating class yet -Poor leadership culture as a result of poor communication and focusing on profits over students and employee experience -All VPs currently leading Campus Scholars division have not worked in higher education before; all have for profit and/or tech backgrounds - this creates a major disconnect between upper leadership and the student experience/employee experience -High turnover and pressure to be profitable as it is a start up culture -Hybrid model is coming back, meaning WFH is phasing out offering less flexibility/autonomy/trust for remote workers -Campuswire crashes every week - this is the primary CRM platform used by staff and students -Half of leads tend to be disqualified/poor marketing strategies

1.0
3 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It’s disappointing to write this, but I am struggling to find much to say. We are provided lunch for days we’re in office and we are hybrid (Monday and Fridays are work from home). My specific team lead is wonderful and transparent with us, but she is one of the only ones who is.

Cons

This company is the WORST place I have ever worked in regard to unwritten rules—I’m specifically speaking about the student success coach department. It’s a start up, and they outwardly champion employees (at any level) contributing ideas while mocking those who do. They’ll ask questions and not want an answer. They will encourage certain behaviors and then limit opportunities for those who follow their explicit instructions. Nothing they say means anything, it’s just “a nice thing to say.” The job market is horrible right now and it’s extremely hard to get an interview, let alone a job… That said, I have heard several people from my department share that once they get ANY opportunity, they will leave. I was very fortunate to learn from my team lead (via a group message to their entire small team, as well as reminders in one-on-ones) to not ask questions in the “big chat” of our team—where we were told to ask questions. My lead let us know that leadership was often irritated by questions that we “should have known the answers to.” Again, this is a start up, and things change regularly without written confirmation of these shifts. If you were in a meeting where it was mentioned, you knew. If you were out of office and missed the meeting, you might be told by a coworker later, if it comes up. I learned most of this far too late and often feel like I’m still looked at (like, physically looked at) like I’m dumb. It’s infuriating and disrespectful. I love working hard and contributing. I have never experienced a workplace like this. The only saving grace is my coworkers. They frequently thank me for answering their questions/letting them in on what I know. We have built a lot of trust. It’s crazy, because it feels like we are just trauma bonding. I often catch people literally crying about this lack of clarity on expectations, and I can only imagine there are many more who feel this overwhelming anxiety who I do not see. I can only do so much, and it should not be necessary for our team to have to figure it out. It’s degrading and unacceptable, in my book. Lastly, I will share that most of the toxic leadership (who judge us so harshly) are based in New York. ALL of our department’s higher ups who make decisions on promotions and give this feedback are there.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 43 Reviews

Glassdoor has 49 Campus.edu reviews submitted anonymously by Campus.edu employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Campus.edu is right for you.