Circassia Reviews

3.3

42% would recommend to a friend

(59 total reviews)

Ian Johnson

54% approve of CEO

31% positive business outlook

Circassia has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 59 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Circassia employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Healthcare industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

59 reviews
4.0
14 Nov 2017

Good experience at unstable company

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They have a decent corporate culture where minorities (including gender, race and sexual orientation) have equal opportunities. They value employees based on performance rather than just the type of role (C suite v. admin etc.) Competitive salaries and good benefits. Management is pleasant to work under.

Cons

They shut down several key branches globally last year and weren’t the most forthcoming with their plans. It seems this was due to poor decision making by upper management and doesn’t seem to be improving anytime soon. High turnover among field employees.

2.0
23 July 2017

Bad time to join, negative outlook

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Location (Oxford Science Park), (relatively) relaxed atmosphere, standard package (25 days holiday, hours 9-5.30 with one hour lunch break).

Cons

Unusual set of priorities - work is supposed to be recognized and rewarded as per their PRIDE values but in practice the management and HR seem more concerned with other issues such as cultural fits. I have been told in no uncertain terms by the HR that taking my lunch break at 3pm once was unacceptable, even though the contract only states that employees are granted a one-hour lunch break, without the time of that being specified, and even when I told them I had to have a late lunch because of work-related constraints. Apparently following a rigid set of (unwritten) rules is more important than productivity. This is all the more surprising in the context of the recent hits the company has taken, with their two major allergy products failing phase III and subsequent closure of the allergy program and ensuing redundancy of half the R&D. This general attitude translates also in being very penny-conscious, in that it is easy to get approval for > £1000 PO's but takes a lot of effort dealing with the administration when much lower amounts are involved. Middle management frequently complains about having to manage the upper management's expectations rather than working with them (it is their way or the highway). Sadly many good people have opted for the latter. Some business decisions of late have been questionable. In the context of failure of two allergy drugs the allergy program was shut down and naturally many redundancies followed. It would seem natural then to want to protect the other major R&D program (inhaled products), but that was also cut back to half, to the point the labs are nearly empty now. I would not recommend taking a position in their labs now because you would be swamped with work that would normally be done by twice as many employees. In many other companies when this happens, it would be the upper management that would be replaced by the board of directors rather than have half the R&D made redundant. The CEO, Steve Harris, has a business but no science background, which is problematic for a company dealing primarily with science concepts such as pharma. A recent deal with Astra Zeneca where they extended some patent rights to Circassia for them to manufacture and sell AZ drugs in exchange for Circassia shares means this previously promising biotech company is becoming mostly a generics-producing company than a succesful R&D enterprise, and possibly paves the way for a future take-over by AZ. As such many of the remaining employees (ones that have not been made redundant recently) are frantically looking for jobs elsewhere.

2.0
19 Aug 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

High Base Salaries Car allowance and fuel reimbursement

Cons

Lack of clear direction Sales reps are not respected or valued by upper management

Viewing 1 - 3 of 59 Reviews

Glassdoor has 60 Circassia reviews submitted anonymously by Circassia employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Circassia is right for you.