Conservice ESG Reviews

3.4

59% would recommend to a friend

(79 total reviews)
avatar

Ryan Nelson

61% approve of CEO

51% positive business outlook

Conservice ESG has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 79 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Conservice ESG employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

79 reviews
1.0
30 Aug 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

New Company with opportunity to gain experience for external jobs Resume builder

Cons

1. High Turnover of employees. This includes 2 VP, 3 Senior Managers, 1 Sales, multiple analysts, 1 Data Architect, 1 Developer, 1 SF Analyst, 1 Operations Manager, 1 Manager, 1 CEO and more in the last year. 2. Layoffs are present. Staff headcount have decreased in the last year and equivalent have not been hired. A lot of middle management have been affected. Many employees were caught off guard and will be without income for a few months. 3. Lack of Diversity. There is a lack of diversity in departments and upper management. Headcount has a disproportionate number of millennial and Gen Z. 3. Lack of Transparency - Goals are not clear. Company changes are not communicated and elaborated. 4. Management Changes. Executives have had reorganization and turnover in the last year. 5. Pay discrepancy in industry. Employees can earn 10-50% more at another company. 6. Limited Benefits. Benefits are not the same as a more established company. 7. Resources and systems are limited. Error handling needs more consideration. 8. Work life balance is not present. Many overtimes hours are needed. Company should hire more to limit overtime hours for employees. 9. Toxic work culture. Management have made threats of being fired and firing. Employees do not feel valued. There is low employee morale. 10. Micromanagement is present. It puts employees on edge. 11. Truthfulness is a problem. Executives tout company is growing but makes layoffs and vague company decisions. Other examples exist as well not just situational. 12. Company uses many temporary employees. 13. Lack of tenured employees. Many employees have left in 1-3 years and some were laid off with about 1 year tenure. 14. Job security. This is a concern with a new company with many changes. 15. Difficulty in employees addressing concerns. Hierarchy makes it difficult to do. 16. Career opportunities are limited. Hiring is limited. 17. Board members should be arranged differently. Oversight could be adjusted. 18. Longevity and growth of different aspects can be a concern. 19. People will say good things to remain on good terms and not burn bridges. Expression is difficult given that it is easy to trace complaints in a small company. 20. Blame should not travel down while credit travels up. Responsibility and changes should be more equitable. More understanding for employees should occur. 21. It is a not a traditional company. It is not perfect. Lessons should be learned from employees and other companies.

3.0
11 June 2018

Great idea, weak leadership

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great mission, fun company culture, good benefits, nice location and office

Cons

Visionless and weak leadership with a limited, uncreative, and inconsistent approach in bringing value to the market; CEO and COO lack professionalism; Following the lead of the CEO, the sales team routinely outright lies to potential customers about current capabilities of the team and platform; This behavior of selling deals that the team is not able to deliver either technically or manually creates great stress internally and will lead to the failure of the company

1.0
24 Feb 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Young, intelligent staff that knows how to work hard to meet the needs of their clients. - Good PTO and benefits

Cons

- Upper management (specifically C-suite) is completely out of touch and continues to pedal a product that does not work as it is promised to. Management is solely committed to haphazard client retention versus the integrity of the product, and employee health and work/life balance. - There is not balance across teams. Some teams are well staffed, others are horribly understaffed thus the work and client balance is completely skewed across the ESG department. - For 5-6 months of the year, you are expected to work unsustainable hours (60+ including weekends) to meet the demands of clients during "reporting season". This could be avoided if the product worked as it should, the teams were more balanced, the sales team did not oversell/overpromise, and the company invested time in high quality training and company-wide standards/processes. - consistent communication between product team and ESG department barely existed, which proved detrimental to working relationships within the company, as well as with Goby clientele. - ESG Dept was understaffed and many of the crucial roles that needed to be filled for teams to be successful remained empty for months at a time while existing employees were expected to pick up slack. This included picking up slack for roles that employees were not assigned to/hired for (I.e. consultants doing the work of data analysts while still being expected to manage accounts). - The company relies heavily on a small pool of individual employees to create and implement trainings, problem solve, and build processes versus building out standards, processes and reference documentation at the upper management level. Turnover rate was incredibly high, thus panic would ensue when long term employees departed as they took institutional knowledge with them. - due to understaffing, most employees are too stressed to be able to adequately support new hires. - large variation in salary between employees assigned to the same roles.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 79 Reviews

Glassdoor has 83 Conservice ESG reviews submitted anonymously by Conservice ESG employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Conservice ESG is right for you.