employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Consumer Product Testing Company

Is this your company?

Consumer Product Testing Company Reviews

2.4

13% would recommend to a friend

(6 total reviews)
avatar

Craig Weiss

Not enough data to show CEO approval

13% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

6 reviews
1.0
17 Feb 2023

CPTC

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Schedule flexibility. One of the best HR personal, if it wasn't because of her understanding and being fair, I wouldn't have lasted this long.

Cons

Effort and knowledge for certain individuals from specific group will not be appreciated. Only go there if you want to be demotivated. People curse left and right in the lab. You have to beg for your raise.

avatar
Consumer Product Testing Company Response
2y
Same person as the 12/21/2021 review. Please read that employer response for the details.
1.0
4 Aug 2022

CPTC

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are none at this company.

Cons

Everything from lack of breaks, lunch time being your own time, no bonus or yearly raise, Upper Management bully employees.

avatar
Consumer Product Testing Company Response
3y
This is a fake review. We have no staff member with the title of Sample Management Technician. We have no staff member in the department that processes incoming samples that is a current employee and has only been with the company for three years. Our staff can take breaks and have a lunch period that they can take on or off site. Staff gets annual reviews for increases which is based upon performance and holiday bonuses. During the height of the pandemic, staff that was working on site were provided bonuses as well. Lon Weiss, Co-CEO
3.0
21 Dec 2021

Company review.

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

small company, short commute, flexible hours.

Cons

No annual performance review, no annual salary increase, very expensive, and bad medical insurance.

avatar
Consumer Product Testing Company Response
3y
This previous staff member was out on maternity leave, and returned to work. She was not reviewed because she hadn't completed a year of work once she returned. The staff member then got pregnant a second time and this time her physician did not want her working in the chemistry department. We made an accommodation to move them to a department and a position that they were overqualified so they could remain on staff. We did not change the compensation level to match the new position. Not once was there any thanks for providing an alternative position and not changing their compensation during this time. Once they returned from that maternity leave, they came back to the chemistry department where they worked for a short time, completing a full year as a chemist, before giving notice. Prior to the two maternity leaves, they received regular reviews and compensation increases. I guess that prior period of time conveniently slipped their mind. We have several choices of medical insurance with varying levels of benefits and subsidized costs. Each staff member gets to choose the option that meets their needs best. Since this staff member has a spouse that worked in pharma, the choice for medical plans could have been the other company, but our company plan was chosen. Therefore, our plan must have been pretty good in comparison and the former staff member is just being disingenuous in her review.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 6 Reviews

Glassdoor has 6 Consumer Product Testing Company reviews submitted anonymously by Consumer Product Testing Company employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Consumer Product Testing Company is right for you.