employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Critical Intervention Services

Is this your company?

Critical Intervention Services Reviews

3.1

52% would recommend to a friend

(96 total reviews)

K.C. Poulin

62% approve of CEO

47% positive business outlook

Critical Intervention Services has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 96 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Critical Intervention Services employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

96 reviews
1.0
30 Aug 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You got a slightly higher than minimum wage paycheck and all the overtime you wanted.

Cons

You won't ever have a steady schedule. The schedule runs Saturday through Sunday and you won't know your schedule until 5pm that Friday. You probably won't get the day off you requested and had approved. If your relief calls out, you stay until somebody shows up or you get fired. In the ATO division, you work with a group of guys that have the wrong attitude all around. You spend 12 hour shifts in a room the size of a bathroom with furniture that's apt to collapse at any moment. And you're expected to be ever grateful to your masters for having the opportunity to work there.

avatar
Critical Intervention Services Response
11y
As with all professions, sometimes it simply is not a good fit. Often times, people make a decision to enter into a profession they are not suited for and find it difficult to make another change . Public Safety in the Private Sector is a very demanding yet rewarding career. The demands and expectations of the officers at CIS are some of the highest in the industry and some of the highest rewards in the industry as well. For some, operating at such a high level is simply too much. CIS strives to always correct any challenges or issues that are brought to the attention of Supervision or Management. CIS obsesses to maintain a Culture free from issues, drama or conflict . Although no company can make every employee happy 100% of the time, CIS takes pride in the fact that the length of employment on average is 2 to 5 years, and a majority of officers rarely have any complaints. Nearly all of the officers that leave the agency to move out of state, go into Law Enforcement of back into the Military state in writing that they enjoyed being part of a unique and tremendously rewarding agency
1.0
23 Jan 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Critical Intervention Services has the right idea when it comes to how private security should be done. CIS officers are tasked with not only reporting and handling violations of private property rules and Florida laws, but they are also expected to gain an understanding and working relationship with the communities and businesses that they are assigned to work in. CIS has an innovative and unique approach to community relations that, in some areas, works quite well. During my time as a CIS officer, I developed a camaraderie with fellow officers that I have not found anywhere else in my several years of private security experience. Other officers are willing to help you learn and grow and will not let you get hurt if they can do anything about it. Supervisors, dispatchers, and backup officers are just a radio call away if you find yourself in trouble or just needing advice or assistance with something. Unlike most security agencies, CIS issues duty gear, a firearm, and ammunition. This is very rare in a field where most other organizations require officers to furnish their own firearm and gear. CIS also has a rent-to-own program for body armor, should an officer elect to participate. In addition to company-issued equipment, technology is available to CIS officers, as well. CIS has a computer-assisted-dispatch program that has the potential to be quite good and the company offers employees a certain number of free training credits to their sister company, the S2 institute.

Cons

While CIS has the right idea as far as community interaction goes, accomplishing the mission of carrying out these interaction often puts officers in situations that are less than ideal . Many properties that CIS officers work at are in rough areas. Officers are often assigned to walk these properties alone at night and initiate unsolicited interactions with the residents and guests of those properties with the sole purpose of passing out fliers and other materials to help build a positive image for the organization in that community. Unfortunately, most of these individuals are less-than-receptive to a person wearing a black tactical uniform and carrying a gun trying to hand them a pamphlet or shake hands and ask them if they have had any problems with their neighbors. CIS officers are often met with rudeness and downright hostility, which forces them to respond in kind, which creates a negative image, rather than the neutral one that would have existed if the interaction had not taken place to begin with. While many officers and supervisors are wonderful teammates and very helpful individuals, others are the exact opposite. Like in any work environment, there are individuals who exist purely to better themselves and push others into a corner where they can be bullied and used as stepping stones to further the career of that first person. Those people exist within CIS and continue to advance. Like in many organizations, there are individuals who exist who do not care about anyone else's safety or wellbeing; this is perfectly acceptable in an office environment, but it is potentially the difference between life and death in a low-income apartment complex in south Orlando at three in the morning. The radio system that CIS uses is hardly reliable, with officers often unable to get radio reception or answers from dispatchers in a timely manner. This, while not a blatant disregard for the safety of its officers, is an oversight that could easily be corrected by using more radio towers and hiring more dispatchers so that all radio frequencies are monitored at all times. CIS assigns many officers to work alone in areas that the Orange County Sheriff's Office and/or Orlando Police Department won't send fully-trained law enforcement officers to alone. If the area is that dangerous for professional lawmen in cars with shotguns, rifles, and state-of-the-art radio systems to go into alone, it is much too dangerous for a security guard to be walking around alone. Many of these locations have dirty, unusable restroom and break facilities, if they have any at all, which is a huge health concern for the officers assigned to those areas, especially ones with shifts in excess of ten or twelve hours. Many locations do not have any sort of indoor area that officers can access, forcing officers to be outside (they are not allowed to sit in their cars) in the elements, which takes a toll on their bodies and their spirits. CIS expects its officers to walk properties constantly for eight, ten, twelve, or even fourteen hours a night in central Florida, yet officers are only issued two sets of uniforms (tops and bottoms). This creates additional hardship on the officer because, especially in summer, uniforms must be washed multiple times a week. Many other security agencies issue four or five sets of uniforms for positions that do not involve sweating or getting dirty. Schedules are irregular and often find officers working multiple ten, twelve, or fourteen hour shifts in a row with little time in between and very few, if any, days off. Everyone loves a little overtime pay here and there, but too much overtime work in the conditions that CIS officers work in is neither healthy nor productive for anyone. Officers will often work night shifts and day shifts in the same week and it is very rare for someone to get a schedule with regular days off. Schedules are published a day or two in advance of the start of the week, giving officers very little time to find childcare or plan other personal events around work schedules. While this might seem trivial, not knowing on Friday night whether or not you work on Sunday gets frustrating and downright maddening at times, especially if you are someone who has a second job or any sort of life outside of work. The CIS dispatch program is decent, however it is not advanced enough to keep officers from being forced to perform redundant tasks. Report writing, for example, must be done in the computer (or on the officer's cell phone, if he was not issued a computer), but many reports are not able to be completed online, though the technology exists to allow such a streamlining to take place. Officers must write one report online, one report on paper, and often supplement that paper report with other paper reports. Supervisors must break away from whatever they were doing to come read and approve those paper reports, a process that many other organizations have converted to online-only, allowing supervisors instant access to every report entered by officers. Like every security guard company, CIS is what you make of it. If you go in with dreams of being high speed and tactical, doing real protection work, and solving problems, you'll be disappointed. If you go in knowing that you're just a run-of-the-mill security guard with a dressed-up uniform, that you are in a dangerous area, and that your best plan of action is to keep your head on a swivel and not rely on your radio, bystanders, or other officers, you'll be okay. CIS tries to make it seem like a glamorous place to work, but it's often just long hours, unreliable schedules, and daily trips to the ghetto to try to interact with people who don't want you there to begin with.

avatar
Critical Intervention Services Response
8y
To The Author of This Review, I want to thank you for taking the time to provide a thorough review of your opinions of our organization. 2-line reviews are empty statements that neither provides potential employees with constructive criticisms or the employer with topics to review with their leadership team. I grabbed a few topics you touched on and would like to take some time and respond to those. I first would like to address the fact that you seem to think that any and all officers are assigned to high crime activity locations. This could not be further from the truth. Personnel matching is key to the success of our officers and the services we provide to our clients. We are very diverse with working environments from access control, to corporate offices, to upscale single-family homes. It is extremely important to us that officers are working in locations they enjoy working as this will allow them to be more productive and maintain good levels of morale. Officers have the ability to let their supervisors know what areas they prefer to work and we try to make arrangements to accommodate them. “which forces them to respond in kind” It is true that CIS officers find resistance from certain community members or guests when attempting to network and anchor the community. It is not a secret, especially in the law enforcement world that individuals with perceived realities and/or negative past encounters with those in uniform have developed walls of opposition, even if they know they are wrong. These challenges are why we are there in the first place. It is why we have security officers and law enforcement officers patrolling our neighborhoods. If there were a simple solution then crime itself would have been abolished or significantly reduced from this country. We do not have the luxury of demanding respect just because we wear a uniform or carry a gun. A matter of fact, neither does law enforcement. It takes a lot of work to establish trust, but that is only achieved through layers of interactions and reciprocal listening/understanding of community issues. “rather than the neutral one that would have existed if the interaction had not taken place to begin with” This statement in your review said a lot. It said if we just ignore the problem then we don’t have to find a solution. There is no neutrality when there is no dialogue; there is only us and them. That is one of the main issues when it comes to community policing and the implementation of meaningful long-term solutions. If you think that you are better than them, well that equates to a certain level of arrogance that is the root cause of failure in addressing these issues. I respectfully say that it appears you really missed this aspect of our methodology, which was taught to you in the Candidate Training Program (CTP). It doesn’t make you a bad person, but if you are not willing to have these difficult conversations and you have a high expectation of those that you come in contact with to respect you just because you wear a uniform, well public safety wither public or private might not be a good fit for you. “Like in any work environment, there are individuals who exist purely to better themselves and push others into a corner where they can be bullied and used as stepping stones to further the career of that first person. Those people exist within CIS and continue to advance.” I can definitely agree with you on this point as every organization suffers from this and I too have been a victim of it. What I will say is that our culture never supports this behavior and we have protections in place to help employees to resolve these issues. I have an open door policy and we also have a department of professional standards that any employee can go and report these incidents. We have an entire section on this in our 300+ page SOP, not to fail to mention our “We Commit” promises to our employees that we discuss in the on-boarding process. “CIS expects its officers to walk properties constantly for eight, ten, twelve, or even fourteen hours a night in central Florida, yet officers are only issued two sets of uniforms (tops and bottoms).” You do start off with 2 sets of uniforms, but we have officers come in all the time for additional tops and/or bottoms. Additional uniforms will be provided if requested. “Schedules are irregular” This is something we are trying to work on. The schedule can be very challenging because of the fluctuating needs of our clients. This is a valid complaint and something we are trying to address. I can tell you that this an industry challenge, not just us. These are forever changing needs of our clients that we have to accommodate. I had to deal with this same struggle when I was in the field and had a family at home. If you constantly need a structured schedule then the security industry is not for you.
1.0
6 Oct 2017

SSG Bravo Officer

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Their high turn over rate and need for bodies on sites makes the hire process very quick. (Offered the job same day I interviewed).

Cons

Was the most corrupt and poorly managed company I have ever worked for. They considered themselves "First Responders" which is absolutely not true, during the time I worked there I met maybe two officers who even had basic first aid training which doesn't even qualify them as "First Responders". They also required their employees to stay during hurricane Irma and as their "rental" Chief stated in an email we are First Responders and will continue to serve our clients. This instance was the last of many straws for me, to blatantly ignore a mandated evacuation from the Governor and put their employees and families at risk is simply arrogant and selfish.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 96 Reviews

Glassdoor has 99 Critical Intervention Services reviews submitted anonymously by Critical Intervention Services employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Critical Intervention Services is right for you.