DOC Maintenance Reviews

3.0

62% would recommend to a friend

(77 total reviews)

Eric Swanson, Jr.

65% approve of CEO

41% positive business outlook

DOC Maintenance has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 77 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The DOC Maintenance employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Construction, repair and maintenance industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

77 reviews
1.0
22 Dec 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Company vehicle and gas card, working independently, SOME decent coworkers, some really great customers.

Cons

First, I'd like to say, the 2 reviews pinned to the top of this review page are probably HR giving the company outstanding reviews, and sponsoring said reviews so that they are the first reviews that potential employees see. I could be wrong, but those reviews read more like an advertisement than a subjective and authentic review. Secondly, if you would like an accurate review of the company, and what it's like to work as a service technician, keep reading. When I first starting working for this company, it WAS a great place to work. But since then, things have spiraled downwards. Let's start with the parts department....or lack thereof. Never in my 20+ years as a technician have I ever encountered such a flawed and dysfunctional parts supply department. This has been bad since day one of my employment. I could write a book on this alone, but let me just say, this department should be a major focal point when it comes to quality within the company, but the parts department is anything but quality. So many things need to be addressed, from wrong parts shipped, to lack of literature in which to select needed parts for repairs. I could go on and on. Second, training for technicians is pretty much non-existent (except for a select few who get trained in-house). Unless of course you count the 3 days during your first week of 'You work on this machine, this machine and this machine'. Anytime a contract is signed for a new piece of equipment, techs usually don't know about it until a service call is issued to the tech. Then the tech gets to train themselves...in front of the customer. Talk about awkward. To top it off, the literature on said equipment is buried somewhere in the most unorganized app in cyberspace. You have to find data through the search option on the app, then sort through multiple icons trying to figure out what applies to the specific piece of equipment you are working on. And that's if the literature is even in the app. There are times when you have to Google search equipment to try to find anything relevant to what you are working on and trying to learn, to help you look like less of a fool to the customer. On that same note, good luck trying to find part numbers on some of the equipment. Many a time, you have to take pics of the part you need, take measurements, estimate angles, speeds, yada yada yada, and submit that to the parts department for them to help find the part. Which usually gets kicked back to the tech to do the research....like they don't already have enough to do. Let's talk customer contracts. I'm no business expert. Just a technician. But how does someone make a business decision to prioritize a customer’s calls, that are a lower percentage of general maintenance service calls, over another customer that are a much higher percentage of general maintenance service calls? In other words, if customer B’s call comes in as an inoperative machine, that call takes priority over customer A’s service call, even though customer A’s call was was assigned first. Boggles the mind. Well, now techs really don't have to worry about that customer who was a majority of their general maintenance services calls anymore. Like we didn't see that coming. The quality of the new people they have hired seems to be dreadful. Dispatchers, DSMs, and technicians in my area all included. Not sure what exactly happened, as some of the veteran technicians are high level technicians. All in all, the job itself is not terrible. But faith in the leadership team to make good decisions for the company has waned. Lack of confidence in your executive team is not a good feeling to have when you need to put food on your table, especially when the work load is on the decline.

1.0
9 Nov 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Flexible schedule - Company vehicle and gas card - Excellent low level management

Cons

- 2 paid holidays a year, Christmas and Thanksgiving - Pay is $10 an hour for administrative tasks like sending receiving emails, checking in/loading parts onto work truck, and any other administrative task assigned by DSM - No annual raises - Minimal training on equipment. A brief overview of SOME of the equipment is provided the first week, but no in depth training on any equipment. Most of the time you have to learn how a machine works and how to troubleshoot it on your own. There are many times when you walk into an account and are faced with a piece of equipment you've never seen in your life. Then you have to figure how the thing even works. From there you have to teach yourself the inner workings of the machine using a service manual (if you can find one) and a schematic. Then you can finally begin troubleshooting the problem. You can call other techs and various other employees for assistance, but you can't call most manufacturers for help because they will deny support. In all, you go into accounts very unprepared your first few months and have to depend on an unorganized app on your phone to provide you with service manuals and part numbers (if you can find one). - Dispatch can be overbearing at times. - Minimal support from the home office. Technicians are treated like the stepchild of the company despite being the product of the company that makes the money. It seems that people in the home office are always looking for ways that the techs can make their job easier, when it should be the other way around. - Communication between the home office and the field is lacking at times, so there are times when your DSM doesn't even know what the proper procedure is for any given task. - In the interview process, it's stated that weekends are not a usual occurrence but you could be asked to work weekends once in a while. Once your in, you are told you have to be available every weekend, and you can be scheduled any weekend at any time, so you have to submit an RTO (requested time off) to your DSM in advance for weekends you have plans and won't be available. A few times "Mandatory weekends" were announced, and all RTO/vacation days/personal days were canceled.

2.0
21 Sept 2019

Dont trust management

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leave you alone to do your work. No manager looking over your shoulder. Plenty of overtime.

Cons

Only 2 paid holidays. They never give raises, even if promised. I feel that some the Regional Directors (west area) have the opinion that technicians are disposable, and treat them poorly. The upper management seems to think that's ok. Most of the "rules" are not written, so they can change at any time The "family oriented" business is just a mask. Under the surface you can't trust what they tell you. Training is non existent. There are manuals online. If you can find them. I've worked here for 4 years and have never been to a single factory training. Dont trust management. When HR says "call me and we can talk about it" you better have another job lined up.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 77 Reviews

Glassdoor has 77 DOC Maintenance reviews submitted anonymously by DOC Maintenance employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if DOC Maintenance is right for you.