Doe Fund Reviews

3.2

52% would recommend to a friend

(130 total reviews)

George McDonald

61% approve of CEO

44% positive business outlook

Doe Fund has an employee rating of 3.2 out of 5 stars, based on 130 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Doe Fund employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Non-profit and NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

130 reviews
1.0
12 Feb 2016

The Dough Fund

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

30 years of helping those who need it the most.

Cons

The McDonalds (and their unfortunate offspring) have somehow managed to make a ton of money out of homelessness. This is an organization in a total tail spin due to their incompetence and not knowing when to give control to the professionals who have tried to intercede. It's impossible to get anything done since there is no consistent leadership, money to pay vendors or trustee support. A sad story of excess and delusion that unfortunately hurts the clients they are meant to serve. Thank god for a platform like glass door since the first thing a new employee has to do is sign a gag rule which speaks volumes about the organization. The CFO has understandably resigned and the entire development was fired - or fled- and is now run by someone who has no idea what they're doing but makes $200k+ per year which is sickening for an organization dealing with homelessness... but then again the McDonalds each make $500k per year, plus housing, hair and makeup, and a formerly homeless gentleman who drives them around town and to their weekend getaway - is there something wrong with this picture?

avatar
Doe Fund Response
9y
While most employee information is confidential, we can confirm that no employee in the Development department was compensated at that level during the period you wrote or before. Executive compensation, on the other hand, is determined by the The Doe Fund's board of directors. It's reviewed annually and compared to other similar organizations before being approved. We hope that addresses some of your concerns.
2.0
3 Sept 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good starting point for people with less experience trying to break into non-profit work. New grads and career-changers would find TDF easier to get into than other similar non-profits in NYC. Mission is great and those trainees who actually succeed in the program do go on to have much better lives than if they were not involved in the program. Depending on your department, strong performers do have the ability to move up to a position with more responsibility fairly quickly.

Cons

Execution of the mission is far below what you would think from the outside looking in. Slick marketing materials, extensive data on the website, etc. makes you believe that this organization is performing at a very high level. It is not. Reporting on numbers is almost never accurate and management has a difficult time determining the success of the program. Everyone relies heavily on anecdotal evidence (or no evidence at all!) when making management and program decisions. The Ready, Willing, and Able program (their flagship) is only one of several programs run by The Doe Fund. Instead of improving the programs they currently offer, the management is constantly dreaming up new services to offer and social problems to solve. They have lost focus on how they want to execute the mission. They have been buying up tons of property to expand the supportive housing programs but have not been investing in their shelter-based programs. They recently let go of the majority of the education department, severely hurting the program participants' chances at achieving a GED. Executives are very out of touch with the programs. The offices on the Upper East Side (where almost all of management work) are completely divorced from the realities of the program work at the shelters and supportive housing programs around the city. They are truly in a bubble... Overall the organization is not financially viable and they demonstrate that in the salaries they pay the majority of their staff. Entry level social service employees receive about (or less than) $30k. Raises are not given and promotions will come with (tops) a 7% increase. Some high-level employees began at the organization 10 years ago in low level positions and make $50k in director level roles! Working in one of the shelter programs can be extremely draining - program participants can be difficult to work with and you will likely have a very large caseload. However, the camaraderie between your coworkers can make it an enjoyable experience. Most social service workers in the shelter-program only last a year or two before burning out or leaving for more lucrative pastures. Working in the management offices can be strange if you come from a social service background. These offices are completely separate from the program and the atmosphere is much more like working at a regular insurance/accounting type corporation than a non-profit. It's hard to stay in touch with the end work that is being achieved on the ground if you spend your entire work week in these offices...

2.0
6 Feb 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The clients make it all worth it.

Cons

After hearing that CEO George McDonald recently sent an e-mail to all employees asking them to balance out the negative reviews on glassdoor, I could not help but post a follow-up review. This points to a fundamental problem with The Doe Fund, which is that it is more concerned about saving face than actually addressing its own internal challenges. Perhaps if they put as much energy into employee-enhancement activities, such as a competitive salary structure, opportunities for internal growth, etc. as they do into silly e-mails about boosting their ratings on a website, they might get the results they want. I also find it disturbing that this e-mail was sent so that the ratings would not be scewed. Yet this initiative of theirs will do just that. I'm sure employees will feel responsible for posting a faborable review, whether or not that's how they really feel. So, really, they are okay with this site mis-representing their organization, so long as it leans in their favor. Unbelievable. If a current employee has their hands on this letter, you should do all users of this site a favor and post it.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 130 Reviews

Glassdoor has 139 Doe Fund reviews submitted anonymously by Doe Fund employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Doe Fund is right for you.