Eagle Genomics Reviews

2.6

28% would recommend to a friend

(18 total reviews)

Anthony Finbow

46% approve of CEO

16% positive business outlook

Eagle Genomics has an employee rating of 2.6 out of 5 stars, based on 18 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Eagle Genomics employee rating is 26% below average for employers within the Pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

18 reviews
2.0
21 Feb 2024

Do not recommend

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some good people hoping to make a difference.

Cons

The company went through an undercover coup at the end of last year that was handled very poorly (and was ethically questionable on many fronts). All sizeable business shifts are hard, but this one was fairly amateur - almost comical at times if it weren't for the fact that they were toying with people's livelihoods (a clear marker of the new leadership's inexperience). The new CEO is an inept and ineffective leader with connections who - prior to her new role - was an inept and ineffective commercial consultant to the business with connections (…picture company-wide gasps and disbelief when her sudden appointment was announced). She subsequently surrounded herself with a relatively unqualified leadership team - some of whom I am sure have the best intentions; but I remain wholly unconvinced of their ability and suitability. The CEO also has a peculiar obsession with Cambridge, and an unwavering belief that filling the gaps with random Cambridge recruits will make up for her mediocrity. Besides the lack of inspiring leadership, sadly the business now also lacks any exciting vision - one of the main reasons many of us chose to work there. And I suspect it is destined for failure or just-below-average at best.

2.0
6 Dec 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A perfect example of misaligned priorities between the board and core team.

Cons

Embarking on a professional journey feels like stepping into the whimsical world of "Twenty Twelve," where absurdity and chaos reign supreme. Our workplace has embraced the satirical spirit of the fictional Olympic Deliverance Commission, with leadership decisions that defy logic and a lack of clarity that rivals any sitcom plot. In a twist worthy of the show's comedic brilliance, the company's leadership, led by what can only be described as a modern-day maniac, has replaced seasoned leaders with a cast of mediocrity. The recent "redundancy" of the VP of People, Product, CFO, then CEO and COO, a consultant replacing the commercial team, adds a layer of irony that mirrors the show's knack for highlighting organisational absurdities. Enter Aldrich, our silent observers and erstwhile guardians of knowledge. Their silence speaks volumes, leaving us in the hands of a group of lads leading a transformation journey that feels more like stumbling through the dark than charting a clear course. Compensation, a subplot of financial unpredictability, has salaries flowing abundantly to the chosen few in the new leadership. At the same time, the rest of the team is left in the shadows without the hikes and revisions. It's a rollercoaster of financial uncertainty that raises serious questions about the company's commitment to fair compensation practices. Lookdown and regional bias are prevalent, with zero trust, micromanagement and salary disparity among a specific group of people from a particular region. A fairer complexion is favoured over the people from the other side. Senior consultants holding directorship across other companies and sharing inputs with many other competitors are given access to IP. Favoritisms over a selected few in promoting closely related fancy titles abound, evident not just from the chaos within but also glaringly displayed on the company's website. The high-grade titles bestowed upon some individuals seem more a reflection of creative writing than an accurate depiction of their caliber. Highly paid consultants lead the business, and the permanent staff report to the consultants. Incidentally, the consultant works for other clients and uses the resources to foster the deliverables of other companies, too. The company's lighthearted approach to federal laws and compliance requirements adds to the surreal atmosphere, seemingly treated as mere suggestions rather than crucial guidelines. As the company expands its reach, it prompts serious reflection on whether the ship is truly seaworthy under the new leadership.

4.0
28 June 2018

Good company, willing to listen

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Lots of smart people working there, domain (science/genetics) is interesting

Cons

Lack of certainty about direction of the product(s) Clash between original agency culture and "new" product culture

Viewing 1 - 3 of 18 Reviews

Glassdoor has 20 Eagle Genomics reviews submitted anonymously by Eagle Genomics employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Eagle Genomics is right for you.