An honest, balanced review for outsiders looking in - Anonymous employee 10x Genomics Employee Review

3.0
4 Jan 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are 3 sets of reviews seen below 1. HR corporate speak that makes you roll your eyes 2. Disgruntled former employee(s?) who were likely let go, so now they sock-puppet the same message 3. Astute, insightful reviews Want an honest review? Here are the pros Strong salaries: only FAANG pays better Equity: Varies significantly between Commercial, Operations, R&D and the support functions (HR, IT, Legal), but is slightly above average Bonus: Until you get to the senior director level, it isn't that much, about average 401k: Below average ESPP: With the stock price so low, it's good to get 15% below the market World-class brilliant people in every department

Cons

Commercial team is underperforming and there don't seem to be consequences yet for the unqualified CCO HR demoralized everyone by arbitrarily deciding to restrict growth opportunities, but if you look around the company, some groups are seeing people get promoted 1-3 times in 18 months, while others have people not being promoted for 4 years Stock has gone from a peak of nearly 200 to barely 15 in 3-4 years Company hires slowly and fires quickly, with some groups questionably overstaffed and others strangely understaffed

Explore other reviews about 10x Genomics

5.0
20 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fast-paced environment with regular product updates to keep things fresh and interesting. 10x does a great job hiring high-quality candidates, so we have very strong teams, including managers. It makes it relatively easy to support products when customers are excited to bring them into their labs.

Cons

No standout complaints, though there are relatively slow promotion rates.

3.0
7 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Many talented and hardworking colleagues Great technology in single cell and spatial omics

Cons

Some key decisions are made based on politics instead of science or technology. Some project leads don’t have the basic knowledge of the techniques and don’t know how to organize a project properly , but are still allowed to lead the projects due to their personal relationship with the senior leaders. People who are closer to the senior leaders are promoted faster or hired with a higher title (sometimes don’t even follow the normal procedures of hiring or promotion), regardless of their contributions or technical skills. At the same time, many folks who do the heavy lifting work are ignored. Some people tend to over-advertise or even manipulate their results, which lead to a huge waste of time and money for others in R&D since the results are not reliable and repeatable. There are feedback surveys each year, but the concerns are rarely discussed seriously.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All