employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

AIDS Healthcare Foundation

Engaged employer

Good Organization - Manager AIDS Healthcare Foundation Employee Review

4.0
8 Nov 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I work 2 years in AHF. This is awesome organization, AHF know what they are doing. The organization operated with equal for Impact and Profit basis, they didn't rely that much to donation, they are able to monetize their efforts through clinic operations, pharmacy, thrift store, food for health, insurance, the gym even housing and giving it back to the community and their operational cost. This is a really good example for social entrepreneurship. self sustain driven mission organization, utilize their profit for the organization and communities benefit. The leadership that I was worked with was amazing, I hope they keep that amazing leaders. Non salary benefit such as 401K, health insurance etc is great.

Cons

1. Beware, some department not really great to work with. Cut throat system. 2. The pay is not competitive, I know this is public charity organization but the salary cant make you survive, you will live pay check to paycheck. AHF HR need to work on competitive salary. I got a new job with the same position externally and new job pay me close to triple compare to what I make in AHF. This is sad and surprised me. HR in AHF need to realize, in order to retain employees, they need to seek outside advise and adjust the pay as "real" competitive benefit. 3. It's about who you know. If you close to decision maker and they like you, it will help you to grow in this organization easily.

Explore other reviews about AIDS Healthcare Foundation

5.0
23 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Collaborate with multidisciplinary team to provide the best care for our patients. Non-profit, great for PSLF. Competitive benefits and PTO.

Cons

Lower salary compared to market.

2.0
22 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A real sense that you’re doing something meaningful.

Cons

While the mission of the organization is admirable, the internal culture often undermined the work being done for vulnerable populations. Leadership turnover was constant, with management structures frequently changing and new supervisors appearing every few months. There were often multiple layers of management with unclear roles, creating confusion, competing priorities, and a workplace environment that felt more focused on internal politics than supporting staff. Many employees were deeply committed to the mission and routinely gave far more of themselves than was sustainable. I know I did. The workload and culture made it easy to lose any sense of work-life balance, and there was little meaningful support for the emotional toll of the work. What was most disheartening was watching an organization built to care for vulnerable people become, at times, one of the most difficult places for its own employees to feel valued and supported. The disconnect between the mission and the treatment of staff was significant. Several years later, I still recognize the impact that experience had on my professional confidence and overall well-being.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All