Great for experience, but not someplace you can be happy - Quality Abbott Employee Review

2.0
29 Oct 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The benefits were solid, the people are good and the products are generally of high quality. It is a great place to gain experience in the industry and it looks great on a resume when seeking your next opportunity.

Cons

Where to start? There is little to no growth opportunity within the Division. The division has not been replacing employees who have left which has resulted in people taking on many extra duties with no recognition. In one functional area, the department has last 14 employees in the past 6 months with no new hires and no plan to replace the personnel who left. Attrition is huge within the past year. Most people try to do a good job, but the bureaucratic hurdles are sometimes so challenging and cumbersome that it wears people down. There is a large level of middle management without enough workers to get things accomplished and Executive Management is too far removed from the daily operations to understand what is going on. The morale is horrible and people will continue to leave if things do not start changing. There is huge favoritism that goes on within the entire organization. Management manages to meet numbers to look good, rather than making the hard decisions that need to be made. No-one wants to cause any commotion and raise the issues to management.

Explore other reviews about Abbott

5.0
3 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work life balance is great

Cons

Remote work opportunities are minimal.

2.0
15 June 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

• Strong brand and market position • Talented individual contributors and subject matter experts sprinkled throughout the organization • Opportunity to work on products that impact many patients

Cons

These comments reflect experience within Abbott Diabetes Care. • Culture can feel political and risk-averse, with difficult issues often addressed indirectly rather than transparently • Decision-making is slowed by multiple layers of management, many of whom appear focused more on managing upward than enabling teams and execution • Long-tenured management structures can create limited accountability, discourage new ideas, and make modernization difficult • Some leadership styles feel hierarchical and dismissive of dissenting viewpoints, making it risky to challenge the status quo • Strategic thinking and decision authority are concentrated among a relatively small group of senior leaders, creating bottlenecks and limiting innovation • Office environments and ways of working often feel outdated compared to more modern organizations • Organizational responsiveness can be frustratingly low. Routine requests, decisions, and communications often require multiple follow-ups, creating unnecessary delays and reducing accountability • Promotions and performance assessments often lack transparency, leading employees to question whether advancement is based on impact, visibility, DEI, or internal relationships • Employees navigating significant career or life transitions may experience varying levels of support, visibility, and development opportunities, making career continuity and progression feel less predictable than they should be

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All