For those considering working for Activate learning. - Teacher Activate Learning Employee Review

1.0
20 May 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

As a teacher there are no pros to be had working for this organisation at present, so please if you are contemplating taking a post at any of the campuses don’t.

Cons

I have held various positions in teaching and across management in F E for over 15 years and have weathered many a change due to funding issues, change of management etc. but nothing had prepared me for the debacle that I encountered when my college was taken over by Activate learning. If you have read the many reviews relating to Activate you are well aware of how poorly rated this organisation is , it is key to note that the majority of these comments come from staff that fall below the pay scale of director. I have just weathered the worst two years of my academic career , the stress that teaching staff have to endure due to the truly incomprehensible management structure that Activate operate is rife across the organisation. When I left I was one amongst many extremely competent and highly professional staff members who left that same week and all had the same reasons for leaving. Activate learning is failing its teaching and support staff. The ratio of Directors (and please note ,I use this term in a truly sarcastic manner) to teachers is ridiculous, as their posting seems to be based upon their ability to sit on their hands and add nothing to the role , whilst praising each other for what seems to be nothing more than having a good chat, In fact just acting as part of an expensive messaging system , just passing on information from one to another, gathered from the many teams meetings that they seem to deem necessary as part of the job. This results in teaching staff receiving and having to respond to emails and reports all relating to the same issue from as many as 6 different sources. I would strongly advise those looking for employment teaching, to please refrain from joining any campus currently managed by Activate learning . There maybe light at the end of the tunnel as a new CEO has been appointed who can hopefully make the required changes to a thoroughly broken business model and if he manages this, then maybe it might well become an organisation that good teaching staff would be pleased to work for , but for the moment avoid at all cost.

Explore other reviews about Activate Learning

5.0
7 June 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great place to work, great benefits

Cons

None I can think of.

2
2.0
27 Jan 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Strong benefits package, including a healthcare cash plan - Generous annual leave that increases with length of service - Salaries have improved since the current CEO joined - Many passionate, committed colleagues across the organisation - A very positive place to work if you’re in the right department - Opportunities to gain qualifications and develop (department-dependent) - Excellent staff events and improving enrichment activities - CEO appears genuinely invested in staff wellbeing

Cons

- Staff experience varies significantly between departments - Limited progression routes in some areas - Poor behaviour by some staff and managers is tolerated or protected - Pay increments frozen for two years following promotion - Heavy and uneven workloads with little flexibility or redistribution - Flexible and hybrid working policies are inconsistent and manager-dependent - Admin staff frequently face unreasonable demands from faculty - Escalatory and political behaviour (e.g. CC’ing managers) instead of constructive dialogue - Feedback is sometimes escalated rather than addressed directly - Favouritism affects workload, progression, and promotion opportunities - Serious concerns about management: in one department, a manager is in a relationship with someone he directly managed. The manager also influenced friendships and working relationships in ways that created tension within the team. - Resistance to new ideas unless they originate from management - Lower-paid staff often demonstrate higher competency than higher-paid roles - Pay disparities across admin roles are not aligned with workload or responsibility - Staff awards frequently overlook non-teaching and frontline staff - Ongoing budget cuts mean vacancies are not backfilled, increasing pressure on remaining staff - Limited investment in facilities, systems, and frontline teams - Too many senior leadership roles compared to investment at ground level - There have been some concerns around governance, particularly with staff representatives serving beyond their intended term. It can sometimes create confusion around accountability and decision-making.

2
avatar
Activate Learning Response
1mo
Thank you for your detailed feedback. We’re pleased you recognise the strong benefits, committed colleagues, development opportunities, and positive initiatives across the organisation. We take very seriously the concerns you’ve raised regarding consistency of experience, workload, progression, pay, leadership, and workplace culture. We are committed to reviewing these areas to strengthen fairness, support, and accountability across the organisation.
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All