employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Alcatel-Lucent

Acquired by Nokia

Engaged employer

Very low Bonus and NO pay raises for every ALU employee in the New Zealand for 4+ years. - Manager Alcatel-Lucent Employee Review

1.0
21 Sept 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Most of the employees are good to work with. Plenty of opportunity to advance to different positions (everyone's quitting), but you won't get paid for it.

Cons

A new country CEO every year or two. All senior leadership recently replaced as they all quit because the new guys is a pain to work with. The new CEO walks around the building floors like he's freaken HITLER on the war path. Mandatory 3 weeks off at Christmas. Which is over half of the your leave balance for the year. The company mobile phone policy is a joke. We build High Speed mobile networks but give your employees crap work phones, or 350 dollars towards a phone. No company perks what so ever, well maybe that $350 if you want to call it that. There is no such thing as a pay raises here. Even if you get promoted.... No bonuses or if your lucky to get one this year it will be next to nothing as the tax man takes it all.

Explore other reviews about Alcatel-Lucent

5.0
12 Jan 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

ALU afforded me many opportunities and the pay was great.

Cons

I can't think of any

2.0
11 June 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The workers at Alcatel-Lucent, at least the former Lucent employees since I worked almost exclusively with these folks, were among some of the smartest and most conscientous I ever worked with. The people who tried really cared and carried the company.

Cons

Alcatel brought with it a lot of the classic characteristics of bad French management. ("Why make it simple when we can make it complex?") Lucent has all the characteristics of a former 100-year old monolpoly. Its management is full of managers who never had to be efficient or organized (since it was based on a "cost plus" revenue system while Ma Bell ran the US phone system). In fact, the more people it hired and the more it spent on useless ideas, the more money it made! It has horrible compensation systems for its management and salesforce (paying for sales, not for profits). The company is very badly organized and while some departments are working 60+ hour weeks, others are fairly useless and make it hard for the productive groups to get real, very needed work done. They promote rah-rah cheerleaders into management who have no clue how to manage except to support the people who suck up to them. There is no well-integrated strategy for the company, and this leads to scattershot efforts at doing anything to have a good quarter, even if it means robbing next quarter's sales and profits.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All