employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Alcatel-Lucent

Acquired by Nokia

Engaged employer

Juntos se constroem times. Se cada departamento continuar falando individualmente, a empresa não construirá o seu objetivo: Aumentar seu lucro e produtividade! - Anonymous employee Alcatel-Lucent Employee Review

3.0
6 May 2014
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A maior vantagem é o respeito que a empresa emprega. Na maioria das empresas geralmente acontece o respeito obrigatório, mas na Alcatel percebí um respeito com ternura, onde prevalecia realmente o tom de voz adequado, o momento certo para se chamar atenção e o emprego correto em elogiar, sem alardes, mas com todo o reconhecimento.

Cons

Falta comprometimento e principalmente conversa entre os departamentos. Resolver problemas simples como um crachá para um novo funcionário, uma informação sobre pagamentos, equiparação salarial ou mesmo uma resposta sobre o que a empresa tem de benefícios para os funcionários demora meses. Entrega de carteira de trabalho por exemplo chegou a demorar 2 meses para acontecer. Crachá foi mais rápido fazer crachá de visitante todos os dias do que esperar 45 dias para chegar um.

Explore other reviews about Alcatel-Lucent

5.0
12 Jan 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

ALU afforded me many opportunities and the pay was great.

Cons

I can't think of any

2.0
11 June 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The workers at Alcatel-Lucent, at least the former Lucent employees since I worked almost exclusively with these folks, were among some of the smartest and most conscientous I ever worked with. The people who tried really cared and carried the company.

Cons

Alcatel brought with it a lot of the classic characteristics of bad French management. ("Why make it simple when we can make it complex?") Lucent has all the characteristics of a former 100-year old monolpoly. Its management is full of managers who never had to be efficient or organized (since it was based on a "cost plus" revenue system while Ma Bell ran the US phone system). In fact, the more people it hired and the more it spent on useless ideas, the more money it made! It has horrible compensation systems for its management and salesforce (paying for sales, not for profits). The company is very badly organized and while some departments are working 60+ hour weeks, others are fairly useless and make it hard for the productive groups to get real, very needed work done. They promote rah-rah cheerleaders into management who have no clue how to manage except to support the people who suck up to them. There is no well-integrated strategy for the company, and this leads to scattershot efforts at doing anything to have a good quarter, even if it means robbing next quarter's sales and profits.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All