employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Alcatel-Lucent

Acquired by Nokia

Engaged employer

Sem visão de futuro não crescimento sustentavel. - Gerente Alcatel-Lucent Employee Review

1.0
15 Nov 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Visão Brasil Ultimamente não há pontos positivos. A empresa não tem um rumo claro e vem perdendo profissionais altamente capacitados e diminuindo cada vez mais os benefícios.

Cons

Visão Brasil A empresa tem contado ultimamente com os profissionais mais antigos que não conseguem sair por conta do tempo e do elevado salário que recebem, isto não significa que são os melhores e sim aqueles que estão ali só esperando para serem dispensados e terem seus direitos pagos, não contribuindo em nada com o futuro da empresa. Esta por sua vez tornou-se totalmente burocrática e com poucos produtos atrativos ao mercado e vem mantendo a dificuldade de sempre de pouca visão de futuro e falta de estratégias adequadas para realização de boas vendas. Ao contrário da concorrência que vê a amanhã a ALU quer ver o hoje e com isto vem morrendo aos poucos.

Explore other reviews about Alcatel-Lucent

5.0
12 Jan 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

ALU afforded me many opportunities and the pay was great.

Cons

I can't think of any

2.0
11 June 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The workers at Alcatel-Lucent, at least the former Lucent employees since I worked almost exclusively with these folks, were among some of the smartest and most conscientous I ever worked with. The people who tried really cared and carried the company.

Cons

Alcatel brought with it a lot of the classic characteristics of bad French management. ("Why make it simple when we can make it complex?") Lucent has all the characteristics of a former 100-year old monolpoly. Its management is full of managers who never had to be efficient or organized (since it was based on a "cost plus" revenue system while Ma Bell ran the US phone system). In fact, the more people it hired and the more it spent on useless ideas, the more money it made! It has horrible compensation systems for its management and salesforce (paying for sales, not for profits). The company is very badly organized and while some departments are working 60+ hour weeks, others are fairly useless and make it hard for the productive groups to get real, very needed work done. They promote rah-rah cheerleaders into management who have no clue how to manage except to support the people who suck up to them. There is no well-integrated strategy for the company, and this leads to scattershot efforts at doing anything to have a good quarter, even if it means robbing next quarter's sales and profits.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All