So your company has been acquired by Aldridge... - Team Lead Aldridge Employee Review

2.0
25 May 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-nice website -offer multiple benefit packages and minimum package is paid 100% -company maintains a list of hardware standards = less devices = easier to support -out of about 25 employees, only 5 were not given a job(about 80% retention ± 5%) during our acquisition

Cons

-job security is low, more so if you are part of an acquisition, you WILL be on a very short leash- during my 3 month period, 7 people from my branch were fired, 1 more within the next two months -management does not know how to appreciate employees and doesn't seem to understand the difference between average and high quality employees- I was once told when suggesting an incentive or contest program "I will not reward employees for doing their jobs", this sums up the entire management attitude at Aldridge (in my opinion) -during this 5 month period, 9 people from the Dallas branch left the company- -At the moment of writing this review, only 7 of the original 25 employees remain(28% ±5%)- -no appreciation for hard work- I once stepped up and worked two consecutive 20 hour overnight shifts in an emergency situation, coordinated 24 hour shifts with another employee who volunteered his free time, we were able to get the company functional as fast as possible with EXTREME dedication, and was never told thank you by any management staff. I also averaged about 55-60 hrs per week during my time at Aldridge and was never thanked for going above an beyond. -time entering time- Aldridge requires that 8hrs of ticket time is documented each day by techs. On average, I spent over an hour each day making sure all of my time was accurately accounted for. Unfortunately, getting 8 hrs documented means I had to work 9-10 hrs per day. The problem with this process is techs need to keep a running total of minutes/hours spent on each ticket in real time. This becomes extremely difficult if you are working multiple tickets at once or waiting for a callback. It creates an environment where techs will embellish time, which negates the entire purpose. Another problem with this is there is no break-time allowed. This is not said out loud, but also not possible to get two 15 minute breaks and document 8 hours without working over 8.5+ hours in a day. -top heavy executive management staff comprised of family members, college friends, and in-laws- If you look at the "Our Management Team" page on the website, 6 out of the 10 are/were married to each other. That's 60% of senior management. If you have aspirations of becoming executive management, this is a very difficult place to do so without first buying a ring. -the only thing constant is change- During my 3 months, I had 3 different bosses. Other departments had similar management changes. -no leadership- (this one is all opinion, but coming from a successful manager with almost 5 years mgmt experience) Management seems to really not know what they're doing. They do not know how to correct behavior with discipline or even direct communication. I believe this is the true reason for the unusually high amount of terminations. I witnessed one employee get fired over an email argument with his boss of the week, an argument in which he was 100% right about what he was saying, but wrong about delivery. Even weak leadership would know to sit them both down and talk to them together. No need to pull the trigger on a termination. Management doesn't build relationships with employees and wouldn't know the first thing about their lives outside of work. To me, this is a huge red flag. Management doesn't recognize talent and thinks that techs are interchangeable and a closed ticket is a closed ticket. In reality, one tech might close a ticket because they tried something that worked. A talented tech will find a root cause and make sure this doesn't happen again at a global level or will spend time documenting what happened and making sure no other tech will take more than a few minutes working on the same ticket before resolving the issue moving forward. The culture at Aldridge rewards the lazy tech in the first example. -no collaboration makes it hard to grow- Teams are compartmentalized. The system is set up to where tickets get "escalated" if the first tech cannot resolve the issue. Techs are not allowed to ask for help and learn from someone in an upper tier. This means a tech that didn't know how to fix a ticket one day will also not be able to fix it the next. Only the escalation guy will know what was done and the team is no better than the day before. -acquiring clients, not employees- It is my opinion that Aldridge buys companies for their clients and not the business itself. In our case, they picked up about 75 clients, lost or fired most of our company's employees, did not rehire any lost/fired positions, and retained a large percentage of our clients. I have no doubt that's good business, but there are a lot of folks that were happy with their jobs before and that was taken away. I don't know how anyone could be proud doing that kind of business.

avatar
Aldridge Response
11y
Thank you for your feedback. Over the past few years, we’ve learned that integrating an acquired company with our organization is an extremely difficult process. We have certainly made mistakes, and I regret that not everyone had a good experience with the process or liked the end result. Aldridge has a very high-accountability culture where only those with the strongest of work ethic will both survive and thrive. We don’t kid ourselves into believing that this culture is for everyone, and we fully expect some fallout in these types of integrations. We really do work hard, however, to make it a great place for those that choose to take this ride with us. I appreciate your comments about appreciation for hard work. I think we, as an organization, can do more to demonstrate our appreciation to our co-workers; we know how hard our team works, and we will work to do a better job of showing people that. I mentioned that Aldridge has a high-accountability culture, and I think that really shows through in time entry. As a professional services organization, where people are our biggest asset, we are hyper focused on making sure that we use our co-workers’ time in the best and most efficient way that we can, and up-to-date, accurate time entry into our system is the best way that we know how to do this. I appreciate your observation about our Executive team and the leadership behind our company, and you’re right about one thing: getting into this group is a difficult thing to do. While Aldridge’s roots are as a family business, I would stand this team of talented individuals up among the best in this business. Operating a best-performing SMB MSP (Small Business Managed Services Provider) at our size with best-in-class performance is something that less than 10% of companies in our industry are able to do. While the relationship status (current or past) is a data point to consider, I’d offer that this group truly makes 100% of its decisions for the Company based on our fourth core value, “Keep the Company Strong,” regardless of its impact on those relationships. As you probably know, Aldridge has been growing at a rate of 30-40% year-over-year. So, when you say that “Change is the only constant,” I couldn’t agree more. This rapid expansion results in us reinventing ourselves continually. Our belief is that if we aren’t changing, we’re dying. If a stable, status-quo environment is something you like (and many rightfully do); you will not be a good fit in this organization. We have come to terms with this. You make a great point about collaboration and compartmentalization. As we’ve grown and matured we have seen evidence of this. We have recently started an initiative to significantly enhance our training and cross-departmental communication. We believe that this will improve over the next several months. Finally, you suggest that we are in the business of acquiring clients, not employees. I would offer that we’re really interested in both, with one caveat. We want both the RIGHT clients and the RIGHT employees. Over the past years, in the various acquisitions that we’ve done, we’ve lost 100% of those acquired employees and some where we’ve lost zero. The key difference is easy to summarize: culture-fit. As I mentioned before, we have a very specific culture that is clearly not a fit for everyone, but for those of us that stay…it’s what we know and love. Thanks, again. Patrick President & COO

Explore other reviews about Aldridge

5.0
20 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great culture, great people and great products!

Cons

Not too much tbh that I can think of

1.0
7 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Free snacks when they remember to fill it.

Cons

It’s all a giant con.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All