Progression depends on your manager - Senior Engineer Arqiva Employee Review

3.0
22 Dec 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Nice stable environment to work,

Cons

Poorly performing management seem to just cluster around each other and never move on to other roles for fear of being found out.

avatar
Arqiva Response
3y
Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts. We are working really hard to make Arqiva a great place to work for everyone and listen carefully to understand the things we are getting right and the opportunities to improve and learn. We really value your feedback so we’d like to learn more about your concerns and what it is specifically that we can do to improve. We suggest you either raise this with your line manager or contact our HR Helpdesk who will be happy to assist you further.

Explore other reviews about Arqiva

3.0
28 Nov 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

People at the DC office were great. The people from the UK that I engaged with were good to deal with. I immensely enjoyed planning the office Christmas party and researching and selecting the new office space after the restructure of the DC office.

Cons

Aspects of communication from the corporate office in the UK. During the restructure of the US operations in 2012, they wasted a lot of money on retaining employees and not having them produce.

1.0
18 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some genuinely talented and committed colleagues who try to make the best of a difficult environment. Hybrid working is a positive, though it doesn’t compensate for the wider issues.

Cons

Pump and dump mentality with personnel. Leadership at L2 and L3 levels is consistently weak, with decisions often driven by personal relationships rather than capability. This creates an environment where nepotism is hard to ignore and undermines trust across teams. Lack of ownership is a recurring theme. Problems and risks are frequently passed around rather than addressed, leading to slow progress and repeated failures. The “Have Your Say” programme has delivered very little, despite repeated promises of change. Feedback is collected but rarely acted upon, which has eroded confidence in the process. Internal development is almost non‑existent. Training budgets are minimal, career pathways are unclear, and the default approach is to hire externally rather than develop internal talent. This leaves teams feeling undervalued and limits progression opportunities. Management communication is inconsistent, and strategic direction often changes without explanation, creating confusion and frustration.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All