Layoffs every quarter, lots of turnover - Software Engineer Array (NY) Employee Review

2.0
23 Oct 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Fully remote - Lots of paid holidays - Half day summer fridays - Tries to be inclusive, DEI is a focus

Cons

- People can disappear over the weekend - There have been layoffs every quarter in 2023, sometimes more than once. We've lost some really great people because of bad planning from executives - Pretty much all of the engineer managers have turned over in the last year. - Tone deaf executives. Especially the CEO - Pay is below market for engineer roles below staff level - Convoluted and overly verbose career advancement system. - Conflicting messages from senior leadership team. Frequently asking people to do more with less, while saying they won't ask people exactly that. - Health care benefits exist, but they are not great quality. Have to consistently look up the doctors that actually take our current healthcare provider.

Explore other reviews about Array (NY)

5.0
1 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Clear expectations at a very stable organization.

Cons

High expectations can lead to friction in some cases

1.0
6 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Got paid for interview and onboarding

Cons

I went through what felt like a “ghost job” type of process. I was given a two-day technical assessment that required very little sleep and included pulling an all-nighter. The assignment was highly realistic and closely resembled production-level work in both scope and expectations. A significant amount of time and effort was required before even having a clearly established or confirmed role. This also included a CCAT assessment as part of the screening process, along with employment verification, ~45 pages of documents, and several hours of video content. After that, I was asked to record two 5–10 minute videos based on those materials, with very minimal prompts and no clear grading criteria or expectations. I was then told I scored just slightly below “acceptable” and was terminated immediately. The entire process felt disorganized from start to finish. The technical assessment was missing key pieces, almost as if it was incomplete or still being tested. During onboarding, I was already being added to meetings and even assigned a task, despite not having fully completed the onboarding process. Part of the reasoning given for my termination was that I wasn’t proactive in pointing out that I had been added to meetings and should have been focusing on onboarding instead. This was especially confusing, as those meetings and tasks were initiated by the team themselves. Given the amount of upfront work required and how the process was structured, this raised serious concerns for me about whether the role was clearly defined or fully established, and whether the expectations for candidates were aligned with an actual longterm position. Advice to others: Be cautious about the time commitment required before the role is fully secured. The process may require substantial effort upfront without clear expectations or evaluation criteria.

9
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All