High-energy culture with supportive leadership and plenty of agency - Sales Executive Ascent Digital Employee Review

5.0
2 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Immediate recognition and rewards for strong performance Direct access to leadership and decision-making processes Real growth opportunities as the company scales Collaborative culture among team members who embrace the pace Clear vision from leadership about where we're headed

Cons

High expectations and demanding workload - you need to be self-motivated Fast-paced environment may not suit everyone's work style Rapid growth means processes are constantly evolving

Explore other reviews about Ascent Digital

4.0
18 Nov 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They give a lot of autonomy with your work and leadership objectives. The team is small for the workload, but gives you great opportunity to learn a lot. Pay is better than most position in Durango.

Cons

Not much growth moving up since the team is so small.

2.0
29 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I got to work on a lot of cool projects and gained significant experience that I wouldn't have had elsewhere. I also genuinely liked my coworkers. The people around me and commiserating were a big part of what made the job bearable. There's also unlimited paid time off - it's the only offered benefit. The great PTO kept me there for longer than I should have stayed.

Cons

I was the longest-standing employee. Everyone before me was either fired or quit rapidly once other options surfaced. I gave it a genuine hard try, I cared, and I'm proud of how much I helped move the company forward while I was there. It was also the most dysfunctional organization I've worked for in my professional career. The core issue is leadership, specifically the owner. Decisions were driven by emotion and ego. The pattern was reactive: respond to a symptom, declare it solved, watch the same problem resurface deeper. Repeat. There was no real plan, only survival mode and a reflex toward whatever quick opportunity appeared next. That dysfunction filtered down through the whole company. The distance between the values marketed externally and the day-to-day reality inside was wide. The culture was improving by the time I left, but its history was toxic and informed my entire experience there. Turnover ran through every layer: clients, contractors, employees. People left within months or were let go, the company steadied for a month or two, and the cycle restarted. Client retention was poor. Internal communication was poor. The expectation was "execute no matter what," without the clarity, structure, or resources that make execution possible. Leadership disparaged former employees in front of current ones and located nearly every systemic failure in a single person, almost never in the system itself. That disparaging instinct is the one worth flagging for anyone considering this place. When something breaks here, the question is rarely what in the structure allowed it. It's who to point at. I watched that happen to people ahead of me, and I have no illusions about how my own exit read from the inside. The job carried most of the downsides of a corporate role and none of the upsides. Pay sat below the scope of the work. The workload was heavy enough to bury people. Financial pressure came from the top often enough that instability became the baseline mood. Employees were expected to operate at a leadership level without the respect, trust, or resources to do it. It wore people down. After five years, the company remains deeply dysfunctional, with leadership citing recent revenue growth as proof of success. Revenue isn't success. They haven't figured that out, and from where I sat, they don't seem capable of an honest read on what the company is actually worth or accomplishing.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All