employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Associated Press

Is this your company?

A Legacy Brand Stuck in the Past—Avoid if You Value Innovation - Specialist - Business Operations Associated Press Employee Review

1.0
19 June 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are no pros to working here.

Cons

The Associated Press is a well-known name—but don’t let that fool you. Internally, it’s a mess. Everything is reactive. Problems get ignored until they blow up, and then leadership scrambles to clean it up instead of learning from it. There’s no vision, no planning, and definitely no interest in evolving. The systems? Ancient. You’re expected to do modern work with decade-old tools, and any suggestion to upgrade or improve gets shut down immediately. It’s like working in a museum—except the exhibits are broken. What’s worse is the culture. If you’re new, be prepared: long-time employees (many of whom have been here 20+ years) treat fresh hires as a threat, not a resource. Instead of sharing knowledge or collaborating, they bring in new people just to dump their own responsibilities and coast. You’ll end up doing their work while they take the credit and enjoy the security of tenure. And if you try to push back or improve anything, you’ll get stonewalled. There are smart people here who want better—but they get burned out fast, constantly fighting an uphill battle against outdated systems and a culture that resists change at every turn. If you’re ambitious, collaborative, and want to build something meaningful, this place will crush your momentum. The AP might still matter on the outside, but on the inside, it’s stuck in the past and perfectly content staying there.

Explore other reviews about Associated Press

5.0
6 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work was easy and supervisors were helpful

Cons

It can get very busy during peak times.

1.0
21 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You get to work with lovely people, some of which are brilliant.

Cons

This is an organization where relationships often matter more than results. Advancement tends to favor visibility and proximity over impact, which can make the path forward feel less about contribution and more about navigation. HR and People functions appear heavily resourced on paper, yet those teams are frequently stretched thin, creating the impression of care without the corresponding capacity to deliver it meaningfully. Each year brings another cycle of organizational reshuffling that can feel at odds with the stated focus on employee experience and development. Learning and development exists, but its purpose is sometimes unclear, as day-to-day work life has grown more complicated rather than more supported compared to prior years. There is a noticeable gap between the language used around innovation and data driven decision making and the organization’s appetite for actual change. The culture often speaks in aspirational terms while operating in familiar patterns. For employees who value transparency, consistency, and progress over rhetoric, this can be frustrating. The result is a workplace that talks about transformation but remains largely committed to the status quo.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All