Used to be better, covid took a toll on health care - Registered Medical Assistant Atrium Health Employee Review

3.0
18 Feb 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Benefits Bonus PTO could be better Depends on your role, and work environment honestly

Cons

falsa advertising of paid holidays... you must accrue PTO and use it for holidays. Pay for clinical staff is awful, but its a nationwide issue. Due to covid we are overworked bc of staff shortage. The nationwide staff shortage is obvious but we are still expected to perform our job as if we weren't and more responsibilities and duties added on top. Instead of being considerate of the burnout, more work is added to compensate. Might not be just an Atrium issue, but more a health care issue and how terrible they treat anybody working clinical roles, the main roles that keep the company running. Depending on where you work some managers are terrible.

Explore other reviews about Atrium Health

5.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good benefits, work life balance

Cons

have to use PTO for holidays

1
2.0
21 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I spent many years in outpatient rehabilitation and saw firsthand how much meaningful patient care can happen when clinicians are empowered. Earlier in my tenure, there were real opportunities for growth, mentorship and professional development. The team was collaborative and deeply committed to patients, and support staff worked hard under challenging circumstances. Those are strengths worth acknowledging.

Cons

As leadership changed, the culture around performance and advancement shifted. Over time I felt that institutional memory, specialty expertise and long‑term contributions were not valued consistently. Promotion practices seemed opaque, and I saw clinicians with substantially less experience and questionable communication acumen move into roles without clear explanations. Most importantly, I experienced increasing friction between high performers and leaders whose roles felt more performative than grounded in clinical or operational expertise. That tension appeared to be tolerated by the institution. Questions about decisions were discouraged, and requests for discussion went unanswered—even when they came from people with decades of service and a record of strong outcomes. After years of above‑average performance reviews, the feedback I received near the end of my tenure seemed inconsistent with my record and, in my view, hypocritical. This sudden shift in narrative felt like a mechanism to justify decisions already made rather than an honest assessment. For clinicians who invest deeply in their programs and relationships, contradictory or last‑minute feedback is demoralizing and undermines trust in the review process. Although department leaders appear to view themselves as emotionally intelligent, my experience was quite different: they delivered polished, stoic performances but did not exhibit the empathy, listening, or unbiased 360 assessment skills that clinicians need from leadership. That disconnect was another source of friction between high performers and management.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All