It's a job. It has it's ups and downs like anything else. - Anonymous employee Banner Health Employee Review

4.0
7 Feb 2009
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible schedule in most cases. The ability to help others. In most cases you can speak candidly with your immediate supervisor. A majority, (but not all) of the doctors are pleasant people and easy to talk to. A lot of the staff you get to know have the same concerns and somewhat feel united in our frustration with the system as a whole.

Cons

Elitest and pack mentality of certain floors and departments. If you can't come to work and know you are in a stable environment with a company who shares your values, it gets to be difficult. Banner has been good about stoking a fire but seems to fall short in maintaining it. As in every corporate job, there are people who are paid to stir things up to justify their leadership and later fall asleep at the wheel. The tuition reimbursement cutback is a travesty. For those of us who joined these hospitals with the intent of making Banner and medicine our lives, we haved been cheated. We are falling short of our goals due to the breaking of a promise made when we were hired. I joined Banner in great part for the tuition benefit which is no longer available to me after substantial service to THEIR causes.

Explore other reviews about Banner Health

5.0
2 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Strong Provider Relationships * Direct interaction with provider groups, health systems, FQHCs, specialists, hospitals, and community providers. * Opportunity to become a trusted resource and problem solver. * High visibility with external stakeholders. 2. Broad Organizational Exposure * Works closely with Claims, Contracting, Credentialing, Configuration, Network Management, Quality, Compliance, Finance, and Operations. * Provides a strong understanding of how the entire health plan functions. 3. AHCCCS & Medicare Expertise * Deep exposure to Medicaid (AHCCCS) and Medicare Advantage operations. * Builds expertise in provider reimbursement, claims, credentialing, and regulatory requirements. 4. Strategic Project Opportunities * Provider Relations often identifies operational gaps before other departments. * Opportunities to lead initiatives such as onboarding improvements, provider communications, educational programs, and operational remediation efforts. 5. Community Impact * Ability to directly improve provider experience and member access to care. * Strong connection to community-based healthcare delivery. 6. Leadership Development * Excellent foundation for advancement into: * Government Programs * Provider Operations * Network Management * Strategic Initiatives * Compliance * Population Health * Executive Leadership

Cons

Like many large healthcare organizations, decision-making can sometimes take longer due to the number of stakeholders involved. Cross-functional projects often require coordination across multiple departments, which can impact timelines but also helps ensure compliance and thoughtful implementation.

avatar
Banner Health Response
1w
Thank you for your 8 years of service at Banner Health. We appreciate your feedback. So glad to hear your great experience!
1.0
15 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This review isn't about the pros of working for Banner Medical Group.

Cons

The last couple of years with BMG, many current and former leaders have encountered ongoing challenges related to the senior leadership team's (Ops Directors and above) behavior and accountability. Expectations and disciplinary actions are not applied consistently, and when disciplinary actions are applied, it is retaliatory for speaking up about these inconsistencies. This has created a culture of distrust and fear between the clinic leadership teams and Ops Directors/Senior Ops Directors. It also goes against Banner's "If you see something, say something" campaign. The HR team has also contributed to the growing fear and distrust by not following their own guidelines, and by the ERC's showing their bias against leaders through their tone of voice when talking with you, baseless accusations against leadership, and approving corrective actions that are vague and missing specific details of the incident that someone is being written up for. It also raises concerns amongst clinic leaders when multiple leaders bring forward the same concerns and issues about Ops Directors over a lengthy period of time and we're told, "we couldn't corroborate your concerns." And when multiple leaders provide ample evidence (Chronological Management Records, Teams chats, email chains, etc.) to disprove these false accusations and you're still placed into corrective action, the word corruption starts to become applicable.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All