Worsening culture with detrimental leadership - Manager Beam (UK) Employee Review

1.0
12 Dec 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You will likely never work with a more compassionate, intelligent and genuinely uplifting team than those you meet at Beam. They truly are exceptional people. The company is experimental and ever-evolving in its ways of working which is interesting and allows you to learn a lot. The standard perks you get at most tech start ups are also good, like the company retreat, nice office and personal development budget.

Cons

It’s honestly hard to know where to start, as it’s truly such a mess at this stage I don’t see any way it will improve unless the CEO and COO are replaced. The founders do not listen to anyone. Decision making is held solely at the highest level, and there is an extreme lack of diversity of thought shared as everyone is too afraid to oppose SLT’s views from fear of being branded ‘negative’. Those that do share receive criticism and often have their progression stunted. The day to day work involves constant fire fighting and overwork. Staff are leaving at an insanely rapid rate, company culture is a mess and still nothing real is being done to fix it. People with lived experience are tokenised and pushed to publicly platform their experience by SLT (and in the past often used without consent), but are rarely listened to when advising on how we could improve the service for our members or company culture, and experience discrimination when it comes to progression opportunities or having their contributions valued. Managers are directed to follow SLT’s instructions on big and small decisions, but are rarely consulted or given an opportunity to input on any of them. Promotions and pay rises are decided by SLT and are largely guided by who they personally like or dislike, despite them having almost no day to day contact with the vast majority of the team. The goal posts for progression are constantly moved. Despite the People team doing their best to implement better policies and practices, these are applied so unevenly across the company so have limited impact on improving things. It’s very clear that the senior team don’t actually care about helping people at all. They largely speak about the rise of homelessness or the refugee crisis as business opportunities for Beam, but show a real lack of empathy in their day to day language around members and staff. The CEO and COO are only interested in creating a ground-breaking tech company that is worth huge sums of money. The people it may help along the way is an afterthought. The quality of the service is far worse than it could or should be, given the huge sums it costs the taxpayer through Beam’s government partners, but the company continues to sell more contracts at a rapid rate instead of genuinely looking at how we can provide value for members and government partners. ‘Open and transparent’ is one of the companies values, but this is weaponised and used as a way to manipulate staff and create a false sense of trust and safety with SLT. Heavily manipulated data is published on the company website to present an image of business success so far removed from reality. Staff are frequently gaslit and told their concerns are baseless or they are the problem. Staff are fired and then coaxed into telling the wider company it was a ‘mutual’ decision. Caseworkers are encouraged to try to meet unrealistically high targets, inevitably meaning the quality of support they are able to offer drops and those easiest to help are prioritised. The company’s goals and strategy is structured so that Beam can cash in the maximum revenue possible for the minimum effort possible, even if that means cutting corners on member support. Beam does nothing to try to end the problems it profits off of, instead simply exploring more ways to squeeze the taxpayer while offering minimal impact. Whilst some of these cultural qualities would be unsurprising in many fast-paced businesses driven by profit, it is directly opposed to the framing of Beam that the founders constantly shove down staffs’ throats. A narrative around company empathy, openness and happiness is constantly pushed, despite the total lack of compassion they show the team or our members. If you want a cut-throat culture driven by growth, at least just be upfront about it.

Explore other reviews about Beam (UK)

2.0
19 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- the general workforce (outside of leadership) are amazing, genuine, kind and skilled people. I loved coming to work and felt motivated to work hard in the interest of my colleagues. I’ve also made and retained friends at Beam and many others would say the same - really well organised company events including summer parties, Christmas etc - good tech - 3 days wfh and the ability to work remotely globally. they say you can work flexible hours and can work the hours of the remote location but in reality it’s a very fixed 9-6 UK time environment. you are looked down on if you’re seen to leave before (or at!) 6 but my guess is there’s a fair amount of performative working - you can have a pretty solid work life balance if you block out the performative work culture. it’s simultaneously a micro manage and hands off management approach, where as long as you’re visible on slack people will think you’re working hard. Put slack on your phone and go to the park!

Cons

- complete lack of company strategy at all levels makes it impossible to know what the focus is both short and long term. In the 2 years I was there, the mission changed at least quarterly - unable to retain staff. in early 2026 the retention rate for staff was less than 50% which means 1 in 2 staff would leave before they made it 12 months. I lasted 2 years and was considered an old hand. - sales targets are deliberately set to be un achievable, and leadership will openly say that they are stretch targets whilst penalising people for not meeting them. For a sales person, doing well at Beam means hitting 60% of your target - this doesn’t translate in the wider sales sector. Furthermore, if you hit your target - rather than celebrating, leadership will raise it as it was “too easy” - sales people regularly let go with no warning and no prior performance management. This is never communicated within the business, they are just deactivated on slack and disappear overnight - although this is somewhat normal in all companies - leadership have clear favourites who are overwhelmingly promoted, celebrated and remunerated above and beyond others. in general these are oxbridge grads. rumours are that only oxbridge grads are hired into leadership roles. - three SLT members and head of HR have no people skills and actively bully members of staff. COO renowned for making employees cry in meetings. Head of HR has no HR experience - pay disparity and lack of general company transparency - bi-annual engagement survey has no follow up. The last one I saw in early 2026 had terrible engagement scores and was literally not spoken about at any point by anyone in leadership. No accountability, engagement surveys are completely performative - benefits are being eroded over time but openly advertised roles reflect old benefits structure - highly performative, slack visibility based culture that rewards woo woo and criticises realism. To succeed you either have to be fully on board with leadership or come from a company that they respect (eg Palantir) There are so many more bad things to say about this company. My guess is that long term this company won’t succeed, which is truly a shame because they hire wonderful, competent people. I’ll be interested to see what happens for them - if I was on the board or a shareholder I’d be asking questions

6
5.0
31 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- great pace of work (fast but satisfying) - energising culture, the people always challenge you in great ways - high performance is rewarded - leadership has become highly responsive to feedback

Cons

- quite rightly we’re very against spending a long time to think about things ( definitely a bias for figuring things out as we go) sometimes we could spend a little longer thinking!

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All