Flawed Processes, Flawed Values, Culture of Fear and Mistrust - Software Engineer C3 AI Employee Review

1.0
22 Mar 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- great coworkers - good mission - free lunch - nice office - fun sports events

Cons

All of the problems I've faced here seem to be the result of poor leadership: - The CEO's decisions are final and non-negotiable (regarding both culture and business). - The management style is archaic, stemming from fear and mistrust of employees. For instance, engineers must log every minute of their work, and are hardly allowed to speak with other employees outside of their team unless 1) explicit permission is granted by management and 2) a "ticket" is filed for the meeting to capture the time spent speaking to outsiders. Engineering management has no idea how to lead people properly; the "apps" team management is especially clueless and ineffective. - There's a "no work from home" policy, which isn't the best but is fine since all employees were told before being hired. The problem with this, however, is that employees are only given 5 sick days per year and are not allowed to work if caught being sick. Got a cold, yet can still get work done at home? Nope, take a sick day, stop working. Out of sick days? Pretend not to be sick when you come into the office or take PTO. Out of PTO? Don't get sick or don't get paid. - Some employees, including the person at the front desk, are treated like garbage. I've seen execs randomly yell at subordinates in front of everyone for virtually no reason, embarrassing them terribly. - C3's mission is overall good, but for a company who began by focusing on the energy industry in order to combat climate change, our customers nowadays are pretty heavily skewed towards Oil & Gas companies.

avatar
C3 AI Response
7y
We are sorry about your experience and perceptions. C3.ai is rapidly growing and does drive a formal and collaborative engineering process to prioritize and deliver product to meet market and customer expectations. With sales growth of 100% and headcount growth of 100% year over year, we are very focused on building a great culture, our customers successes, and on-time delivery of a highly differentiated product. In regard to your comments: 1. We hold all our engineers to high standards of code quality and sprint delivery with well-established tools and processes. We use Jira for release and engineering management and request engineers to keep track of their work. These are consistent with established best practices in agile software development and followed by the world’s best engineering organizations. 2. Your assertion that people yell at employees in the office is absurd and is antithetical to the culture at C3.ai. 3. C3.ai management is hard at work building a successful software company and has a stellar track record of building multiple market-leading large-scale enterprise software companies. That record speaks for itself. 4. We understand that when an engineer receives a negative performance review for not delivering on projects or consistently delivering poor quality code, he or she may respond negatively and lash out.

Explore other reviews about C3 AI

5.0
23 Mar 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leading products and technology. Great manager and team.

Cons

Recent quarterly results below expectations.

2.0
1 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Smart and talented colleagues with strong problem-solving skills. Opportunity to work on large-scale enterprise applications for Fortune 500 customers across industries such as manufacturing, supply chain, energy, and defense. Exposure to AI/ML-driven business applications and complex data integration challenges. Fast-paced environment with significant ownership and opportunities to contribute across the stack. Employees on platform and infrastructure teams can gain experience with distributed systems, backend services, and core platform development. Competitive compensation and exposure to high-impact customer-facing projects.

Cons

Much of the application development work relies on C3.ai's proprietary Type System and platform abstractions rather than widely adopted industry frameworks. Skills gained in some application-focused roles may not transfer as directly to companies that primarily use Java, Spring Boot, Kubernetes, AWS-native services, or other mainstream technologies. Engineers looking to build expertise in designing scalable systems from scratch may find fewer opportunities, as many platform capabilities are already provided by the underlying framework. Technical growth can vary significantly depending on the team. Platform teams often work with core technologies, while application teams may spend more time configuring and extending existing platform functionality. The learning curve for the internal platform can be steep, and much of that knowledge is specific to the C3.ai ecosystem. Career development and marketability outside the company may depend heavily on the nature of the projects and teams an engineer is assigned to.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All