Disorganized, Poor Management, Poor Benefits, High Turnover - Engineer III CDM Smith Employee Review

1.0
24 June 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Flexible Work Option - High Starting Salary

Cons

- Company as a whole is disorganized from the file structure to unnecessary acronyms for everything to management. - Too many hoops to jump through. A lot of wasted unbillable time spent on multiple review processes each year and fixing your own IT issues since they refuse to keep a fully competent IT staff in the USA. - Terrible benefits. No paid maternity or paternity leave. No paid short or long term disability, discretionary 401k match is only once a year(can’t take advantage of compounding and if you leave between 1 year increments you don’t get any prorated amount) and the match is at most 3% and not uncommon to be lower, health insurance coverage is good but premiums are high and continue to rise each year. - High turnover. Every month it seems someone is leaving or being let go. Company focuses heavily on utilization and will let go of employees if their utilization falls below their expected rate. Company is technically private but seems to be ran as if it’s public. - They start your salary high to get you into the door but don’t expect more than a 3% raise each year and no bonus unless you’re in management. - Pushes using their India staff even on projects funded by US tax dollars.

Explore other reviews about CDM Smith

5.0
22 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Lots of training and opportunities

Cons

Company structure can be confusing

1
avatar
CDM Smith Response
3w
Thank you for taking the time to leave us a 5-star review! It was great to have you as an employee and wish you all the best in your future endeavors.
2.0
18 June 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible hybrid schedule is very nice and starting salary is high for early career engineers.

Cons

The main people running the company are not engineers and you can tell. They are all focused on utilization with rates often set at 97% or higher. This had led to my supervisor asking/telling me to not charge company required trainings. As an early engineer it really feels like they don't want to invest in me and only care about their bottom line. If you are an early career structural engineer you will also not get any meaningful work until you've been with the company for at least 5 years. The senior engineers do not trust you and will only give you grunt work.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All